Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Just cause silver who is wrong most of the time said it was an interview everyone just assumes it was?
When has he been wrong?
There are 446 users in the forums
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Just cause silver who is wrong most of the time said it was an interview everyone just assumes it was?
Originally posted by Jcool:about kyle going back to Atl, HuJack
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Just cause silver who is wrong most of the time said it was an interview everyone just assumes it was?
When has he been wrong?
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
no wonder Cable took himself out of the running .
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Jcool:about kyle going back to Atl, HuJack
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Just cause silver who is wrong most of the time said it was an interview everyone just assumes it was?
When has he been wrong?
Originally posted by Jcool:i don't know how else to tell you ?
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Jcool:about kyle going back to Atl, HuJack
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Just cause silver who is wrong most of the time said it was an interview everyone just assumes it was?
When has he been wrong?
Originally posted by billbird2111:
Not a bad thing in my opinion. Denise is the true owner of this club. It's a sign that the entire family is fully involved and committed to fixing this mess.
Let me ask you this: Would you rather have the true owner of this team completely disinterested in the process of fixing this team. Off on a beach in Waikiki? Not giving a damn one way or another?
This is really good news IMO.
Originally posted by WINiner:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Report: Denise York interviewed Tom Cable.
Why?
What does that mean? Do John and Denise interview everyone?
Why leak this now?
Who is doing pr for the board?
Please fix all this kyle. We're begging.
Probably because its a SMART idea for a woman owner to interview a head coach candidate with domestic violence issues in his past. If they were even remotely interested in hiring him, having her speak to him first was pretty much a prerequisite.
For all we know, she could have been the one that completely shot down any chance of Cable being hired.
In this regard I don't mind her being involved. She's still a Debartolo and was an executive with the Penguins when they won a Stanley Cup. Seeing how John and Jed have run things, I'm down for Denise taking on a larger role, whether it was a one time thing or she has taken a larger role in running things behind the scenes, I doubt that she could make it any worse.
Gadzooks NO!
Denise is even further removed from football operations than Jed.
It makes no sense, and -- unless it's part of the hiring protocol to have members of the board interview potential HC/GM candidates -- it makes our process look completely improv amateur style -- management-by-fiat.
Seat of the pants. I hope that this is part of a larger process that we can point to and say, yes, this is step 16 of the Senior exec hiring protocol.
You are seriously reaching man.
Originally posted by billbird2111:To say that the "assumption on the posters part is probably way off base" is an assumption on the posters part and is probably way off base.
Agreed. To say that Denise York is "removed" from football operations is an assumption on the poster's part and is probably way off base. I like the fact that she got involved. I hope John York is involved as well as Jed and Eddie D. for that matter.
People tend to forget that Eddie D. made a bunch of stupid, misguided hires before he hit paydirt with Bill Walsh. A lot of that was just plain, dumb, luck. Those two found one another. Walsh needed a team and had an ax to grind after getting hoodwinked by the Bengals. Eddie D. needed a coach who knew what he was doing after bungling hires at the GM and coaching positions. Walsh just happened to be making magic down the road at Stanford. It was magic waiting to happen.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:To say that the "assumption on the posters part is probably way off base" is an assumption on the posters part and is probably way off base.
SO, before we get into mudslinging on DY football knowledge, the real point is that the process can't be improvised like this. It's a sign we don't have our act together. All senior exec candidates should go through a similar Q&A and discussion with predefined personnel which should include individuals with specialized knowledge and experience of the interviewees skill set and expertise. Owners don't usually have that, unless they have been coaching or GM'ng for 20 years. The Yorks don't have that.
Owners can talk to candidates, as a part of the process, but there should be more structured interaction.
Teams with an intact front office probably do this.
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Denise is the owner of the team, why wouldn't she interview him?
Originally posted by English:But teams replacing both HC and GM probably don't. Why not judge this one by the results. I can't think of any franchise right now except GB where the owner wouldn't be right there in it.
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:Originally posted by btthepunk:Denise is the owner of the team, why wouldn't she interview him?
It makes sense considering Cable was accused of domestic violence