There are 207 users in the forums

Better opportunity for a HC - 49ers on Rams?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

Better opportunity for a HC - 49ers on Rams?

Originally posted by Rascal:
Originally posted by hondakillerzx:
a new set of headaches comes with LA tho. its a big city, young players will do stupid things, media scrutiny will be higher.

Our players don't do stupid things? They don't even need to be young. Let's see, Aldon Smith, Bruce Miller, Ray McDonald just to name a few.
i never said that at all...
Rams, sadly. Neither team is in much of a position to win soon. But the Rams have a super rich owner who seems committed to his team's success. Niners have the Yorks :(
It's all about ownership. Rams win, hands down.
Rams by a long shot!
Both have poor, lazy ownership, both are poor choices, but I would gladly take either job....its the f**king NFL!
  • susweel
  • Hall of Nepal
  • Posts: 120,278
LOL ouch


10. San Francisco 49ersRegardless of whether the 49ers keep Chip Kelly, this roster is unrecognizable from the one that likely would have won a vote as the league's best in 2013. Even the players who are left -- guys such as linebackers NaVorro Bowman and Michael Wilhoite and quarterback Colin Kaepernick -- haven't looked like themselves, as they've battled injuries and age. This is a mess of an organization, from top to bottom.

It's far more likely that the 49ers would fire general manager Trent Baalke before making any decision on Kelly, but in either scenario, the roster is years away from being competitive. Kaepernick has been an upgrade over Blaine Gabbert, but he's still struggling to correct his issues with pocket presence and accuracy and is likely to leave during the offseason. The 49ers are likely to finish the year with a top-three pick, but it has come during a year when there doesn't appear to be a quarterback worth taking. Todd McShay's first mock draft doesn't include any quarterbacks before the 30th selection.

And the 49ers aren't going to be stocked with draft capital in 2017, either. They'll have an extra fourth-round pick because of Alex Boone's departure and a couple of late-round selections, but they'll have nothing else to help restock the roster.

New management would have a scarcely fathomable amount of cap space to work with -- the Niners could easily roll into March with more than $100 million of room -- but who wants to play there? It would take a remarkable long-term effort to reshape the organizational culture in San Francisco, and whichever coach intends to do so would be joining an organization hiring its fourth head coach in four years. Does that sound appealing?


http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18280597/ranking-nfl-best-potential-coaching-jobs-2016
Rams. No one who isnt a 49er homer would even think its close.
Originally posted by SammyFrancisco:
Rams, sadly. Neither team is in much of a position to win soon. But the Rams have a super rich owner who seems committed to his team's success. Niners have the Yorks :(

I agreed with you until I read the bolded.

Have you looked at the franchises the guy owns and how the Rams have been doing since he took over? He finally fires Fisher which was long, LONG overdue and suddenly you think the guy is committed to success? LOL. I guess the Yorks are committed to our team's success since they fired Tomsula last year! Oh wait...
  • FL9er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,793
What I find interesting is the prevailing opinion by many is that the Rams done goofed with selling the farm for Goff.

A lot of GMs and coaches love this job if they can move on from Goff.
  • Rascal
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by susweel:
LOL ouch


10. San Francisco 49ersRegardless of whether the 49ers keep Chip Kelly, this roster is unrecognizable from the one that likely would have won a vote as the league's best in 2013. Even the players who are left -- guys such as linebackers NaVorro Bowman and Michael Wilhoite and quarterback Colin Kaepernick -- haven't looked like themselves, as they've battled injuries and age. This is a mess of an organization, from top to bottom.

It's far more likely that the 49ers would fire general manager Trent Baalke before making any decision on Kelly, but in either scenario, the roster is years away from being competitive. Kaepernick has been an upgrade over Blaine Gabbert, but he's still struggling to correct his issues with pocket presence and accuracy and is likely to leave during the offseason. The 49ers are likely to finish the year with a top-three pick, but it has come during a year when there doesn't appear to be a quarterback worth taking. Todd McShay's first mock draft doesn't include any quarterbacks before the 30th selection.

And the 49ers aren't going to be stocked with draft capital in 2017, either. They'll have an extra fourth-round pick because of Alex Boone's departure and a couple of late-round selections, but they'll have nothing else to help restock the roster.

New management would have a scarcely fathomable amount of cap space to work with -- the Niners could easily roll into March with more than $100 million of room -- but who wants to play there? It would take a remarkable long-term effort to reshape the organizational culture in San Francisco, and whichever coach intends to do so would be joining an organization hiring its fourth head coach in four years. Does that sound appealing?


http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/18280597/ranking-nfl-best-potential-coaching-jobs-2016

Again that is precisely why we need to hire a big name that both coaches and players actually know and respect to be the Head of Football Operations figure like a Mike Shanahan. You can't just think you are trying to be smart to nail down on some young front office talent from another team. That won't cut it. A young guy like that won't be able to convince any talent, be it coaches or players to even sit down and listen what he has to say.

Not even close... Rams
  • FL9er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,793
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-potential-head-coach-openings-in-the-nfl-chargers-on-top-jets-in-last/

49ers rated ahead the Rams who are next to last, lol.
  • titan
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,839
Rams cause it's vacant.
  • dmax
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,775
Rams...not even close
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
The Rams are just as much of a trainwreck as the Niners right now. Talent level is pretty equal as well.

Plus, the Bay > LA.

I don't agree...

They have a highly rated rookie QB and a budding star RB to build with. We just have the RB and ours can't stay healthy. They still have also one of the best front 7's in the NFL and ours is breaking records for ineptitude even with the potential Buckner is showing. Then you have to deal with the Yorks who have proven to not just be leaky babies but are more than willing to thow you under the bus and pull triggers on whims.

This and then some.
Share 49ersWebzone