Originally posted by NinerSickness:
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
So we take a tackle top 10 to compete with brown to start?
It doesn't have to be the top 10. What I'm saying is that Brown has shown enough to give me confidence to stick him at RT as the starter. Davis needs to play guard or stay retired IMO (and I'm hoping it's staying retired because I think the money will be better spent elsewhere).
How is the money better spent else where? Our issue is offensive line, and guess what, anthony davis was really good not to long ago, even performed decently when he played in 2013.
Brown has never performed at the level AD has. We have nearly 40 million in cap space, and his cap hit is 5 million next year, not much for a potential bookend. So we are just going to hand the role to either a rookie, or a 7th round pick who has played like three games? Sounds like a roll of the dice and a lot of hope, maybe its a homerun, maybe you end up with the same right tackle play the last two years, or mediocrity. AD is healthy now(unlike 2013, and 2014), would be stupid not to see what a former probowl level player at RIGHT TACKLE(who isnt even 27) can do. Why should he play guard, a position he has never played at? I just think the logic is silly and more predicated on people being upset that he retired due to concussions.
So for a player we dont need to acquire through free agency, need to trade for, or spend a pick on, we potentially acquire a potentially really good player(if he returns to form) at a position of need at a manageable cap number. Yeah lets just not utilize that opportunity because we have a 7th rounder, with a weight issue, from last year who played 3 games
. not saying i dont like trent brown, the upside is there, but Im not about putting all my eggs in one basket.
PS: why do you bold every players name? kind of weird.
[ Edited by philosoraptor on Jan 5, 2016 at 4:02 PM ]