Costanzo's back

Originally posted by Ninerfan81:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by English:

Originally posted by Ninerfan81:

Originally posted by English:

You think we might keep Lloyd? I kind of viewing him as half out the door but I guess it depends on how he performs in TC and the preseasons.

B. Lloyd will definitely make the team based on his experience and his ability to get open. Besides we all saw what happens to this team when we lose talented wide receivers to injuries. Davis is prone to several hammy pulls a year too. He'll make it.

I think he is on the cusp. If I am laying money down its on him not making it.

agree with Eng, Lloyd couldn't even get on a team last year

That was his choice to not sign with a team. Here's what the media said today at the OTAs.

With so many receivers absent, veteran Brandon Lloyd was by far the most popular target. He's looked good – very good – in both sessions that have been open to the media.Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/06/03/6455397/ota-notes-josh-johnson-steps-up.html#storylink=cpy

Originally posted by AB81Rules:

#1 talent? Don't even say Lloyd is a #1 talented WR, the guy was out for a year, and is pure crap IMO. Osgood did more for us good, than Lloyd did in 3 years here IMO.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

You do know we didn't half our WRs at OTAs today, lockette was last years gem.

Lloyd is one dimensional and we don't use that many 3/4 WR sets. So he will be just taking space
Osgood plays all STs and can actually produce on STs, he can also sub in on some plays if needed.

Lloyd if cut will not be picked up by anyone unless they have some unfortunate injuries. So we can probably resign him later if needed.
Osgood will definitely get picked up if he gets cut, because he is really that good on STs

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You do know we didn't half our WRs at OTAs today, lockette was last years gem.

Lloyd is one dimensional and we don't use that many 3/4 WR sets. So he will be just taking space
Osgood plays all STs and can actually produce on STs, he can also sub in on some plays if needed.

Lloyd if cut will not be picked up by anyone unless they have some unfortunate injuries. So we can probably resign him later if needed.
Osgood will definitely get picked up if he gets cut, because he is really that good on STs

Lmao lloyd will get picked up.

Originally posted by luv49rs:

why are you on lloyd's nuts?

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by luv49rs:
why are you on lloyd's nuts?

Why aren't you? We have the chance to have amazing depth at a position we've needed depth every year and yall wanna throw that away for a gunner of all things. Theres plenty of guys that can play gunner.

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You do know we didn't half our WRs at OTAs today, lockette was last years gem.

Lloyd is one dimensional and we don't use that many 3/4 WR sets. So he will be just taking space
Osgood plays all STs and can actually produce on STs, he can also sub in on some plays if needed.

Lloyd if cut will not be picked up by anyone unless they have some unfortunate injuries. So we can probably resign him later if needed.
Osgood will definitely get picked up if he gets cut, because he is really that good on STs

Lmao lloyd will get picked up.

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

You do know we didn't half our WRs at OTAs today, lockette was last years gem.

Lloyd is one dimensional and we don't use that many 3/4 WR sets. So he will be just taking space
Osgood plays all STs and can actually produce on STs, he can also sub in on some plays if needed.

Lloyd if cut will not be picked up by anyone unless they have some unfortunate injuries. So we can probably resign him later if needed.
Osgood will definitely get picked up if he gets cut, because he is really that good on STs

Lmao lloyd will get picked up.

are you lloydrules by any chance?

Originally posted by cciowa:

lol at people who pooh pooh special teams and think anyone can play gunner. maybe luv is not on his nuts because she chooses not to be just like many of us. did you see the special ed teams on our super bowl team? were you even born then?

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

You do know we didn't half our WRs at OTAs today, lockette was last years gem.

Lloyd is one dimensional and we don't use that many 3/4 WR sets. So he will be just taking space
Osgood plays all STs and can actually produce on STs, he can also sub in on some plays if needed.

Lloyd if cut will not be picked up by anyone unless they have some unfortunate injuries. So we can probably resign him later if needed.
Osgood will definitely get picked up if he gets cut, because he is really that good on STs

Lmao lloyd will get picked up.

are you lloydrules by any chance?

Lol no. He's just way better than anyone wants to give him credit for. Yall hold a grudge because he didn't succeed along with the other 53 guys back in 04. I believe this Costanzo move makes Osgood expendable on the unit we've actually needed help, kickoff coverage. We've been fine covering punts with or without Osgood.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

He's ok, but he's at best the 4/5th WR that would hardly see the field.

We haven't been good on punts, 2011 awesome, 2012 worst in the league, 2013 better...2014 could be awesome with Osgood and Blake

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

He's ok, but he's at best the 4/5th WR that would hardly see the field.

We haven't been good on punts, 2011 awesome, 2012 worst in the league, 2013 better...2014 could be awesome with Osgood and Blake

Originally posted by WilliamDonovan:

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
#1 talent? Don't even say Lloyd is a #1 talented WR, the guy was out for a year, and is pure crap IMO. Osgood did more for us good, than Lloyd did in 3 years here IMO.

Name a receiver that did anything during the time lloyd was here or any receiver that did anything years after. Nobody succeeded on the 9ers at that time. He's been a #1 receiver on the last 3 or 4 teams hes been on. How is that not a #1 talent?