Originally posted by Need4Speed:
Originally posted by KegBert:
Two wrongs don't make a right. It was a good no call and the call against Brooks was a bull s**t call too.
You not liking the rule has nothing to do with how it should or shouldn't be called. I can't tell if you just troll because you like to be devi;'s advocate or if you can't see the forest through the trees. Your argument boils down to it was good because I say so.
So since you decide how football is played and what should be the rules and that's how the refs will do it. Can you do something about the forward pass. We would dominate if there was none.
Haha what are you talking about? When did stating your opinion become trolling in the webzone?I'm in no way under the delusion that my opinion of the rules effects how the refs call them, nor do I think i get to make up the rules lol.
I feel like that was a good no call for the same reason I think the Brooks penalty was a bad call. The defenders, in both instances, where just doing their jobs, which is to come off the edge and get to the QB. Neither of those hits looked malicous, just good clean football and I simply don't believe that we should be flagging players for doing their job.
So yes, I like the no call and hope that refs start to heir on that side of things instead of throwin a hanky every time an offensive player gets sneezed on.
[ Edited by KegBert on Dec 28, 2013 at 2:49 PM ]