Originally posted by iluvdemniners:
the weakhawks can have all of our garbage all day and all night.
He didn't look like garbage to me. He looked like mini Wilson.
There are 214 users in the forums
Originally posted by iluvdemniners:
the weakhawks can have all of our garbage all day and all night.
Originally posted by Izyniner:
I think the love for cooper is alittle over the top everyone is saying how he shut down Nicks but he has only had 33yds the last two games mainly cause there oline is terrible. with that line half webzone couldve shut him down.
Originally posted by Ninerman49:
Why does this organization continue to make questionable roster decisions... it seems everyone that is half way decent we are cutting or getting rid of..
Cam Johnson 7th round pick, physical specimen finally shows the upside we took the risk on with the 7th rounder.. wins a game ball... we trade him for another 7th... useless trade...
Lavelle Hawkins.... not a great player, but played well for us in the preseason... we reward him with a cut..
Bj. daniels... for a rookie looked REALLY good.... we cut him for skelton???
I don't know whats going on here, but it seems to me we are not allowed to have decent backups on this team...
Originally posted by NCommand:Your point here seems to be based on the assumption that the offense that the 49ers are going to be running suits BJ Daniels better than it suits Skelton. That might well be the case, if the 49ers are planning to continue running the "Read-Option".
No offense but if CK goes down, I'm fairly certain most in here would feel more comfortable with BJ Daniels who seems to fit our current system better (and who's been in it this entire time) vs. a known-product in Skelton who knows nothing about our offense and who seems counter to the type of offense we do run here.
Originally posted by buck:
I am concerned about the roster moves the team makes.
Hawkins and Daniels have not played in one game since they have been released.
There is no solid evidence to indicate that their releases are mistakes.
There is no solid evidence to indicate that cutting Cam Johnson and Parys Haralson were mistakes.
Each and every one of these four moves COULD BE a mistake, but it is equally true that these same moves COULD BE good moves.
Like everyone else, I am only expressing my opinion. And I do think I am being fair to the players involved in the trades.
Originally posted by davidb:
Your point here seems to be based on the assumption that the offense that the 49ers are going to be running suits BJ Daniels better than it suits Skelton. That might well be the case, if the 49ers are planning to continue running the "Read-Option".
However, if the 49ers have actually decided to go back to the Jumbo formations, run-first, play action pass offense (which was what they did vs the Rams) then maybe Skelton is a better fit.
If that is their plan, then the 49ers waiving Daniels may not be as illogical as it looks.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:haha,, in the pre season vs guys who are now pouring cement for cessford construction.never fails to amaze me how people can fall in love with a project who will most likely never make a dent in the nfl. clayton, sheets, pj fleck, nate davis scott t. do you want me to go on? a third strong project who maybe does not fit out system and is now with seattle will not be a franchise killer
Originally posted by iluvdemniners:
the weakhawks can have all of our garbage all day and all night.
He didn't look like garbage to me. He looked like mini Wilson.
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by Ninerman49:
Why does this organization continue to make questionable roster decisions... it seems everyone that is half way decent we are cutting or getting rid of..
Cam Johnson 7th round pick, physical specimen finally shows the upside we took the risk on with the 7th rounder.. wins a game ball... we trade him for another 7th... useless trade...
Lavelle Hawkins.... not a great player, but played well for us in the preseason... we reward him with a cut..
Bj. daniels... for a rookie looked REALLY good.... we cut him for skelton???
I don't know whats going on here, but it seems to me we are not allowed to have decent backups on this team...
How much have those 3 contributed to a NFL team since we cut them?
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Well clearly getting rid of two experienced players who know our system, then having to sign a free agent who has never played with us and who likely has physical shortcomings, puts egg on our face No one could have known about aldon blah blah. Aldons situation is analogous to an injury. I think we should have contingencied one of our olb's sitting for 6-8 weeks, just as a matter of course. I would have preferred to keep haralson, but probably it would have been at least Johnson because i think he is eligible for one more year of PS? Plus, I think when you consider the team we want to be, you think of having strength, depth on D. So you favor keeping talent around that will play to that strength over other positions, IMO.
Originally posted by davidb:i love NC but to me the kid with no red boxes filled up hit it out of the park
Originally posted by NCommand:Your point here seems to be based on the assumption that the offense that the 49ers are going to be running suits BJ Daniels better than it suits Skelton. That might well be the case, if the 49ers are planning to continue running the "Read-Option".
No offense but if CK goes down, I'm fairly certain most in here would feel more comfortable with BJ Daniels who seems to fit our current system better (and who's been in it this entire time) vs. a known-product in Skelton who knows nothing about our offense and who seems counter to the type of offense we do run here.
However, if the 49ers have actually decided to go back to the Jumbo formations, run-first, play action pass offense (which was what they did vs the Rams) then maybe Skelton is a better fit.
If that is their plan, then the 49ers waiving Daniels may not be as illogical as it looks.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by buck:
I am concerned about the roster moves the team makes.
Hawkins and Daniels have not played in one game since they have been released.
There is no solid evidence to indicate that their releases are mistakes.
There is no solid evidence to indicate that cutting Cam Johnson and Parys Haralson were mistakes.
Each and every one of these four moves COULD BE a mistake, but it is equally true that these same moves COULD BE good moves.
Like everyone else, I am only expressing my opinion. And I do think I am being fair to the players involved in the trades.
Well clearly getting rid of two experienced players who know our system, then having to sign a free agent who has never played with us and who likely has physical shortcomings, puts egg on our face No one could have known about aldon blah blah. Aldons situation is analogous to an injury. I think we should have contingencied one of our olb's sitting for 6-8 weeks, just as a matter of course. I would have preferred to keep haralson, but probably it would have been at least Johnson because i think he is eligible for one more year of PS? Plus, I think when you consider the team we want to be, you think of having strength, depth on D. So you favor keeping talent around that will play to that strength over other positions, IMO.