There are 217 users in the forums
2013 Season Roster Moves (trade/release/pick up)
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:34 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 120,276
BJD will get picked up by Seattle. Book it
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:34 PM
- joseglopez00
- Veteran
- Posts: 80
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Originally posted by SFL49ER:
Originally posted by NinerFan408:
I just dont see how the roster is better with skelton
THIS THIS THIS! What the f**k Harbaugh
Believe it or not, he knows more about football than you do.
NO WAY!?!
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:37 PM
- real9erfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,653
Originally posted by susweel:
BJD will get picked up by Seattle. Book it
I don't think Seattle will want to put him on their 53-man roster.
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:37 PM
- jimmythegreekjr
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,543
Colt McCoy must really suck and BJ Daniels is iust not ready to even play. The only reason to sign Skelton is to compete for back up role, which BJ Daniels was not able to do. Would you really be comfortable with either McCoy or BJ Daniels in a starting role at this point? There are not a lot of QBs out there...49ers were probably watching Matt Flynn and it gave them nightmares about McCoy.
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:39 PM
- real9erfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,653
Originally posted by jimmythegreekjr:
Colt McCoy must really suck and BJ Daniels is iust not ready to even play. The only reason to sign Skelton is to compete for back up role, which BJ Daniels was not able to do. Would you really be comfortable with either McCoy or BJ Daniels in a starting role at this point? There are not a lot of QBs out there...49ers were probably watching Matt Flynn and it gave them nightmares about McCoy.
Matt Barrows reported that Skelton is likely to move into the No. 2 QB role. I guess they really do not think very highly of McCoy.
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:40 PM
- Gore_21
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,684
Only reason I see to sign Cunningham with Lemonier and Skuta doing well is if they think Aldon will be out for significant time. Like most of the season. As for cutting Daniels makes absolutely no sense. I don't care if you're bringing in Skelton then cut McCoy to do it. Daniels has a lot of potential; a lot more than Skelton who I some what like and liked coming out of college. Daniels has a lot more potential than McCoy as well who seems to have hit his peak. Also, why bother with Marecic? Some times seems like we make moves just to make them. Bottom like you want Skelton or another QB you cut McCoy not Daniels. Even if he makes our PS he will be picked up by the end of the season.
[ Edited by Gore_21 on Oct 1, 2013 at 2:42 PM ]
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM
- DelCed2486
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,158
Wait, what? I've been away from my computer for a few hours. Someone please tell me this a joke, that the 49ers did not cut Daniels and sign Skelton.
I'm waiting..
I'm waiting..
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM
- xcfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,873
skelton is a d-bag. baalke makes a dumb, fantasy football move.
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM
- SFrush
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,048
I don't know what Gm's see in Skelton.
[ Edited by SFrush on Oct 1, 2013 at 2:42 PM ]
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:42 PM
- Jcool
- Veteran
- Posts: 43,462
Originally posted by real9erfan:
Originally posted by jimmythegreekjr:
Colt McCoy must really suck and BJ Daniels is iust not ready to even play. The only reason to sign Skelton is to compete for back up role, which BJ Daniels was not able to do. Would you really be comfortable with either McCoy or BJ Daniels in a starting role at this point? There are not a lot of QBs out there...49ers were probably watching Matt Flynn and it gave them nightmares about McCoy.
Matt Barrows reported that Skelton is likely to move into the No. 2 QB role. I guess they really do not think very highly of McCoy.
When did he say that?
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:42 PM
- joseglopez00
- Veteran
- Posts: 80
Originally posted by DelCed2486:
Wait, what? I've been away from my computer for a few hours. Someone please tell me this a joke, that the 49ers did not cut Daniels and sign Skelton.
I'm waiting..
Well technically the 49ers haven't signed Skelton... Yet... It's just what "sources" have told Barrows.. SO I can say with good confidence: That part is a joke... for now
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:43 PM
- xcfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,873
if daniels clears waivers, i'll accept that i don't know anything, and i'll shut up.
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:43 PM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,641
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by real9erfan:
Originally posted by jimmythegreekjr:
Colt McCoy must really suck and BJ Daniels is iust not ready to even play. The only reason to sign Skelton is to compete for back up role, which BJ Daniels was not able to do. Would you really be comfortable with either McCoy or BJ Daniels in a starting role at this point? There are not a lot of QBs out there...49ers were probably watching Matt Flynn and it gave them nightmares about McCoy.
Matt Barrows reported that Skelton is likely to move into the No. 2 QB role. I guess they really do not think very highly of McCoy.
When did he say that?
Josh Freeman will definitely get a work out then
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:44 PM
- SFL49ER
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,952
I just realized that the world is ending when BJ Daniels gets released but when the National government shuts down, I haven't given it two cents worth of thought!
LOLZ
LOLZ
Oct 1, 2013 at 2:44 PM
- DelCed2486
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,158
Originally posted by joseglopez00:
Originally posted by DelCed2486:
Wait, what? I've been away from my computer for a few hours. Someone please tell me this a joke, that the 49ers did not cut Daniels and sign Skelton.
I'm waiting..
Well technically the 49ers haven't signed Skelton... Yet... It's just what "sources" have told Barrows.. SO I can say with good confidence: That part is a joke... for now
Baalke does realize that there is tape of Skelton playing QB in the NFL, right? It's not very pretty stuff.