There are 83 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

2013 Season Roster Moves (trade/release/pick up)

Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by valrod33:
Upgrade over Kraepernick


Upgrade over McCoy.

Skelton isn't an upgrade over anyone! He's terrible.
  • Jcool
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 19,554
Niners Nation ‏@NinersNation

I realize Daniels looked good in preseason, but people are reacting like the 49ers just cut Colin Kaepernick. Let's pump the brakes a little
why not bring in skelton when you need him?
why expose daniels to waivers if its not necessary?

whats the difference between an inactive daniels vs an inactive skelton?
NOTHING!!!!!
Originally posted by grizzlyadams:
Skelton isn't an upgrade over anyone! He's terrible.

This. Horrible move.
Don't know why we didn't cut Marlon Moore, but everyone just relax and take a deep breath.. You guys act like we just released Kaepernick. Actually no, you guys probably wouldn't be as upset with that move. This forum gets HUGE man-crushes on preseason players.. sheesh..
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,536
Originally posted by ads_2006:
cunningham was 53rd overall in 2012 draft. Taken by the Pats, was likely cut due to drug suspension.


2010 draft, ads.
Originally posted by joseglopez00:
Don't know why we didn't cut Marlon Moore, but everyone just relax and take a deep breath.. You guys act like we just released Kaepernick. Actually no, you guys probably wouldn't be as upset with that move. This forum gets HUGE man-crushes on preseason players.. sheesh..

because the roster is depleted of healthy wr's, including another one who just broke a foot. they didnt add a wr today so they certainly werent going to cut one.
Originally posted by joseglopez00:
Don't know why we didn't cut Marlon Moore, but everyone just relax and take a deep breath.. You guys act like we just released Kaepernick. Actually no, you guys probably wouldn't be as upset with that move. This forum gets HUGE man-crushes on preseason players.. sheesh..

its not so much the release, as it is bringing in skelton to fill the same position
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
why? simple...cuz bj daniels doesn't need to take up a roster spot, he will clear waivers easy and be on our practice squad (taking daryl morris's spot)

Yeah, so far that sort of speculating hasn't gone all too well for them....witness Marcus Cooper and MarQueis Gray.

Agree... Niners getting a little to cute with their playcalling and now with their roster moves... Either way even if he makes it to the practive squad he is still exposed for someone else to sign
Yes, it is a horrible move...This guy's a dead beat.

http://www.cincyjungle.com/2013/5/31/4382990/john-skelton-responds-to-child-support-claims
Originally posted by ChipDouglas510:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Matt Barrows ‏@mattbarrows

The #49ers hope to add B.J. Daniels to the practice squad tomorrow. He must clear waivers, however. Remember, Seattle liked him in draft.


not sure how they could sign him to the active roster

daniels would have to go to their practice squad, not sure why he would leave us then.
Originally posted by NinerFan408:
Originally posted by joseglopez00:
Don't know why we didn't cut Marlon Moore, but everyone just relax and take a deep breath.. You guys act like we just released Kaepernick. Actually no, you guys probably wouldn't be as upset with that move. This forum gets HUGE man-crushes on preseason players.. sheesh..

its not so much the release, as it is bringing in skelton to fill the same position

The Skelton thing is just a smokescreen in my opinion... I may be in denial though
Originally posted by joseglopez00:
The Skelton thing is just a smokescreen in my opinion... I may be in denial though

huge denial, another team worked out skelton and our FO panicked
  • KRS-1
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 28,243
The sky IS NOT falling.
  • boast
  • All City
  • Posts: 87,747
Originally posted by jimmythegreekjr:
Yes, it is a horrible move...This guy's a dead beat.

http://www.cincyjungle.com/2013/5/31/4382990/john-skelton-responds-to-child-support-claims

meh.