Originally posted by buck:
I still think keeping an open mind makes sense, don't you.
Wallace has not been cut, has he? Wallace might be better than McCoy, but at this point we really have not seen Wallace play.
If I remember correctly Harbaugh made the quarterbackwhoisnolonger here much better than merely serviceable.
My mind would have been much more open if Harbaugh hadn't named McCoy as the #2.
Sure, I would love to look at what Wallace could do. I just don't see why he had to make that announcement so soon. We are not going to keep 4 QBs, are we ?
I don't know what to make of it, unless it is some kind of a smokescreen in order to get McCoy traded, other than that he shouldn't be #2, no frigging way !!