Originally posted by Rascal:
My goal has always been to migrate all of our QBs to dual threat cos that to me is the future of this position.
I had no idea.
There are 261 users in the forums
Originally posted by Rascal:
My goal has always been to migrate all of our QBs to dual threat cos that to me is the future of this position.
Originally posted by BrianGO:
Originally posted by NCommand:
He makes everyone else look inferior. Ha
And LOL @ people thinking Wallace will be pushing Tolzien or McCoy. Wallace hasn't even seen our playbook yet!
So, if he's not going to be pushing Tolzien or McCoy, why did we sign him? To see him naked in the locker room? To serve as a critical 5th quarterback in the preseason? To get his autograph?
Originally posted by Rascal:
I am over it. Lockette is gone, too bad, but we need to move on.
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Originally posted by buck:
Originally posted by Rascal:
My goal has always been to migrate all of our QBs to dual threat cos that to me is the future of this position.
I had no idea.
I don't think that's an easy task. Coaches have been looking for dual threat QBs for years. It's hard to find them. It's actually quite rare that RGIII, Wilson, and Kaep all blossomed the same year. It's ideal to have a QB that can throw the ball as well as he can run, but I don't think a whole lot of them are out there. That being said, it nice that we have one.
Originally posted by Rascal:
As far as the 9ers are concerned, to be a successful team, you need to have an open-minded approach and welcome new ideas and concepts. You don't follow the trend, you set the trend. I think it only makes sense for us to turn dual threat 100%.
Originally posted by nannite:
Originally posted by Rascal:
I am over it. Lockette is gone, too bad, but we need to move on.
Why is it too bad? The guy was arguably the worst receiver on the roster. They couldnt play him as a gunner because they wouldnt have been able to justify activating him as a WR on gamedays. Plus he was old enough to where the 'physical upside' argument really starts to fall apart. If they had tried to trade him, they wouldnt have even gotten a trashy Jon Baldwin level of player.
Originally posted by Rascal:
First of all, I am not going to debate about how good or bad Lockette was, but only to say I think a lot of fans had high hopes for the guy. If age was an issuse, then we could easily talk about Osgood too, but I also happen to like him too. However, I couldn't disagree with you more on Jon Baldwin being "trashy". If you want to talk "trashy", AJ Jenkins is the epitome of precisely that. I am so glad that Baalke pulled the trigger and finally managed to unload him. In any case, I don't know where you got "trashy" from in looking at Baldwin. He was a top 5 graded WR in the 2011 draft. He has all the measurables and I will take my chance on him than to be stuck with Jenkins any day.
Originally posted by buck:
Originally posted by Rascal:
As far as the 9ers are concerned, to be a successful team, you need to have an open-minded approach and welcome new ideas and concepts. You don't follow the trend, you set the trend. I think it only makes sense for us to turn dual threat 100%.
In three years, Colt McCoy has rushed 93 times for 363 yards (3.9 yard average) 1 touchdown
In his career, Seneca Wallace has rushed 68 times for 293 yards (4.3 yard average) 1 touchdown
But, 212 of Wallace's rushing yards came in 2005 to 2008.
In the last three years, Wallace has rushed 30 times for 81 yards(3.8 yard average)
I am not sure if either Wallace or McCoy should be considered dual-threat quarterbacks.
Compare their rushing numbers with the top rushing quarterbacks last year :
1. Robert Griffin—118---833--7.1--7
2. Cam Newton --127--- 741---5.8---8
3. Russell Wilson---94-- 489---5.2--4
4. Colin Kaepernick---63—417-- 6.6—5
Like I said, I just am not sure.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Wallace can probably run the read-option.
Originally posted by Rascal:
I wasn't referring to Wallace as some dual threat stud. What I was trying to say is that should be the direction we should consider. As for Wallace, his career path was kind of messed up from the word go. Seattle probably wanted to use him more as a WR as opposed to QB. He never really had a chance to develop as a QB. He was either playing behind Hasselbeck or catching passes from Hasselbeck, that was how screwed up it was.
Originally posted by Rascal:
Yes, he can. Have you seen his clip ? There you go :
Originally posted by buck:
I was one of the strongest supporters of Lockette. I really wanted him to do well.
When he was cut, I was disappointed. The final 53-man roster has not been determined. Lockette might be back.
I hope he comes back, but I have a strong inclination to hope for the best for Division 2 players.
Originally posted by buck:
Originally posted by Rascal:
Yes, he can. Have you seen his clip ? There you go :
Those are his highlights. They make him look an All Pro quarterback, and we know he isn't.
Maybe we need to study a clip of his lowlights.