There are 94 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS VS GREEN BAY PACKERS GAMEDAY THREAD (Week 1)

Originally posted by zillabeast:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 18m

#Packers Adding QB Tolzien to Practice Squad http://gnb.scout.com/2/1321591.html#.UiKJFuYTLjE.twitter ;…

5:24 PM - 31 Aug 13 �
Practice squad? I figured they would need a quarterback to back up rodgers right away. Unless they plan to promote him to the roster sometimes during the season.


I guess. He should have been Kap's number 2. I don't know why he regressed so bad.

The OL we played him behind was hot garbage. You had to be mobile to buy time then have a powerful arm to get the ball there on scramble drills. Scott had neither. He needs a clean pocket that our backup OL didn't provide. BJ had the physical tools to overcome this and make something out of nothing. Scott has it upstairs but not genetically. If he played with our starters more perhaps he would have fared better
Originally posted by SFrush:
We're in good shape to win this game if Staley contains Clay Matthews. Green Bay's front seven can't generate enough pass rush to slow down Kaep without Matthews.

Our front seven on the other hand will have a field day with GB's terrible offensive line.

I'll say we win 34-21

Matthews beat Staley for 3 sacks in week 1 last year, and we still beat their asses lol. They're gonna need a flawless performance from Rodgers to stand a chance. We're definitely more balanced and better in the trenches. We should have our way with them.
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Matthews beat Staley for 3 sacks in week 1 last year, and we still beat their asses lol. They're gonna need a flawless performance from Rodgers to stand a chance. We're definitely more balanced and better in the trenches. We should have our way with them.

lol true.
Not GB game related but wanted to share this:

From Barrows:
Several teams thought B.J. Daniels was better off at RB. He not only makes #49ers roster at QB, he eventually could move to the No. 2 spot.

So first it's Jim Schwartz telling Harbaugh you won't be able to win with a shortened offseason. We are a few plays from a SB berth. Then it was the 49ers taking an All Conference DE in the 7th round and making him a FB. Everyone thought we were crazy. He's now one of the better FB's in the league. Then we take BJ Daniels at pick 237, 2nd to last QB taken, some teams say he will be a better RB. Highest rookie QB rating in the preseason. Looks like a Nike commercial to me. JK
[ Edited by Gore_21 on Aug 31, 2013 at 8:53 PM ]
Originally posted by Gore_21:
Not GB game related but wanted to share this:

From Barrows:
Several teams thought B.J. Daniels was better off at RB. He not only makes #49ers roster at QB, he eventually could move to the No. 2 spot.

So first it's Jim Schwartz telling Harbaugh you won't be able to win with a shortened offseason. We are a few plays from a SB berth. Then it was the 49ers taking an All Conference DE in the 7th round and making him a FB. Everyone thought we were crazy. He's now one of the better FB's in the league. Then we take BJ Daniels at pick 237, 2nd to last QB taken, some teams say he will be a better RB. Highest rookie QB rating in the preseason. Looks like a Nike commercial to me. JK

Heck yeah, we're the San Francisco 49ers, we can do whatever we want.
Originally posted by zillabeast:
I guess. He should have been Kap's number 2. I don't know why he regressed so bad.

Because he was never any good. At all. He's terrible.

The Packers know this. They just want the goods on the Niners' offense.

[ Edited by VPofCarnage on Aug 31, 2013 at 9:15 PM ]
  • LVJay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 5,123
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 18m

#Packers Adding QB Tolzien to Practice Squad http://gnb.scout.com/2/1321591.html#.UiKJFuYTLjE.twitter ;…

5:24 PM - 31 Aug 13 �
Practice squad? I figured they would need a quarterback to back up rodgers right away. Unless they plan to promote him to the roster sometimes during the season.


I guess. He should have been Kap's number 2. I don't know why he regressed so bad.

The OL we played him behind was hot garbage. You had to be mobile to buy time then have a powerful arm to get the ball there on scramble drills. Scott had neither. He needs a clean pocket that our backup OL didn't provide. BJ had the physical tools to overcome this and make something out of nothing. Scott has it upstairs but not genetically. If he played with our starters more perhaps he would have fared better
Totally agree. Now he can learn from Rodgers and I wish him well while he rides the pine with clipboard in hand.

I'm just glad that woman (carroll) wasn't interested!
  • LVJay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 5,123
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
I guess. He should have been Kap's number 2. I don't know why he regressed so bad.

Because he was never any good. At all. He's terrible.

The Packers know this. They just want the goods on the Niners' offense.


LOL!!!
Originally posted by LVJay:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Packer Report ‏@PackerReport 18m

#Packers Adding QB Tolzien to Practice Squad http://gnb.scout.com/2/1321591.html#.UiKJFuYTLjE.twitter ;…

5:24 PM - 31 Aug 13 �
Practice squad? I figured they would need a quarterback to back up rodgers right away. Unless they plan to promote him to the roster sometimes during the season.


I guess. He should have been Kap's number 2. I don't know why he regressed so bad.

The OL we played him behind was hot garbage. You had to be mobile to buy time then have a powerful arm to get the ball there on scramble drills. Scott had neither. He needs a clean pocket that our backup OL didn't provide. BJ had the physical tools to overcome this and make something out of nothing. Scott has it upstairs but not genetically. If he played with our starters more perhaps he would have fared better
Totally agree. Now he can learn from Rodgers and I wish him well while he rides the pine with clipboard in hand.

I'm just glad that woman (carroll) wasn't interested!

No regression, just slammed into his athletic ceiling.
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Because he was never any good. At all. He's terrible.

The Packers know this. They just want the goods on the Niners' offense.




Not in any position to disagree.

Maybe he got stressed out after loosing his good bud Alex.
Originally posted by zillabeast:
Not in any position to disagree.

Maybe he got stressed out after loosing his good bud Alex.

I think Smith has been a good mentor.
Originally posted by Young2Rice:

where the hell is Crabtree going?
I swear to god if tolzien tips them with our play book...
so juiced