There are 123 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

**Update Eric Wright signed to one year deal**

Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
and let the reporting tell the truth...

it begins

Matt Barrows @mattbarrows
JH said he was healthy enough to play. Based on that...@nonz: was Eric Wright demoted or held out of yesterday's game because if injury?


lol.


let me guess, he isn't insinuating exactly that wright was demoted...right? lol...

BLIND
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
and let the reporting tell the truth...

it begins

Matt Barrows @mattbarrows
JH said he was healthy enough to play. Based on that...@nonz: was Eric Wright demoted or held out of yesterday's game because if injury?


lol.


let me guess, he isn't insinuating exactly that wright was demoted...right? lol...

BLIND

no. that's my tweet to Beerows. it fails to answer the question.

and please quit it with the attitude. thanks.
  • kem99
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 586
Originally posted by lamontb:
Agree that Harbaugh just says things that i'm not sure he thought about beforehand, but I believe him on this one. If he was hurt i simply believe he would have just said Cox played b/c Wright was still hurt. Nothing really to hide we all know he has a hanstring injury. No team in the league goes into preparation worrying bout Eric Wright or Cox. Not sure what's the point of lying in this case, but it is possible.

Except that...Harbaugh doesn't provide any information on injuries unless he absolutely has to, so, of course, he's going to say Wright was good to go. At a minimum, it forces the Panthers to prepare for Rogers, Wright and Cox...and, yes, all teams to spend preparation time on the strengths and weaknesses of the slot corners.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
and let the reporting tell the truth...

it begins

Matt Barrows @mattbarrows
JH said he was healthy enough to play. Based on that...@nonz: was Eric Wright demoted or held out of yesterday's game because if injury?


lol.


let me guess, he isn't insinuating exactly that wright was demoted...right? lol...

BLIND

no. that's my tweet to Beerows. it fails to answer the question.

and please quit it with the attitude. thanks.

attitude? sorry didn't realize writing "blind" is attitude but you posting ur emoticon isn't hahahaha get a grip boast.

ur answer has already been provided, the writers asked him yesterday if wright was injured, harbaugh said NO and then they asked if that means cox has taken over the job and harbaugh said he doesn't talk about nickle back controversies (harkening back to when he said he doesn't talk about punt returner controversies etc and only position he'd discuss any "controversy" over is qb"

will not understand this support for eric freakin wright haha
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
and let the reporting tell the truth...

it begins

Matt Barrows @mattbarrows
JH said he was healthy enough to play. Based on that...@nonz: was Eric Wright demoted or held out of yesterday's game because if injury?


lol.


let me guess, he isn't insinuating exactly that wright was demoted...right? lol...

BLIND

no. that's my tweet to Beerows. it fails to answer the question.

and please quit it with the attitude. thanks.

attitude? sorry didn't realize writing "blind" is attitude but you posting ur emoticon isn't hahahaha get a grip boast.

ur answer has already been provided, the writers asked him yesterday if wright was injured, harbaugh said NO and then they asked if that means cox has taken over the job and harbaugh said he doesn't talk about nickle back controversies (harkening back to when he said he doesn't talk about punt returner controversies etc and only position he'd discuss any "controversy" over is qb"

will not understand this support for eric freakin wright haha

emoticon? better check yourself. and yes calling posters blind is a personal attack. last warning iLL. last warning.
Originally posted by kem99:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Agree that Harbaugh just says things that i'm not sure he thought about beforehand, but I believe him on this one. If he was hurt i simply believe he would have just said Cox played b/c Wright was still hurt. Nothing really to hide we all know he has a hanstring injury. No team in the league goes into preparation worrying bout Eric Wright or Cox. Not sure what's the point of lying in this case, but it is possible.

Except that...Harbaugh doesn't provide any information on injuries unless he absolutely has to, so, of course, he's going to say Wright was good to go. At a minimum, it forces the Panthers to prepare for Rogers, Wright and Cox...and, yes, all teams to spend preparation time on the strengths and weaknesses of the slot corners.

wright was good to go, he was on the 46 man roster, u think they'd sit joe looney or nick moody as inactive if wright wasn't ready to play???? those guys are healthy are ready to contribute and OL injuries would necessitate looney playing so if wright wasn't ready to play he would've been sat

also, when they played DIME...PFF's jeff deeny said cj spillman got the dime reps over eric wright
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
and let the reporting tell the truth...

it begins

Matt Barrows @mattbarrows
JH said he was healthy enough to play. Based on that...@nonz: was Eric Wright demoted or held out of yesterday's game because if injury?


lol.


let me guess, he isn't insinuating exactly that wright was demoted...right? lol...

BLIND

no. that's my tweet to Beerows. it fails to answer the question.

and please quit it with the attitude. thanks.

attitude? sorry didn't realize writing "blind" is attitude but you posting ur emoticon isn't hahahaha get a grip boast.

ur answer has already been provided, the writers asked him yesterday if wright was injured, harbaugh said NO and then they asked if that means cox has taken over the job and harbaugh said he doesn't talk about nickle back controversies (harkening back to when he said he doesn't talk about punt returner controversies etc and only position he'd discuss any "controversy" over is qb"

will not understand this support for eric freakin wright haha

emoticon? better check yourself. and yes calling posters blind is a personal attack. last warning iLL. last warning.

yes ur emoticon of a smiley face laughing, that's not "insulting posters" but saying blind is? lol
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by kem99:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Agree that Harbaugh just says things that i'm not sure he thought about beforehand, but I believe him on this one. If he was hurt i simply believe he would have just said Cox played b/c Wright was still hurt. Nothing really to hide we all know he has a hanstring injury. No team in the league goes into preparation worrying bout Eric Wright or Cox. Not sure what's the point of lying in this case, but it is possible.

Except that...Harbaugh doesn't provide any information on injuries unless he absolutely has to, so, of course, he's going to say Wright was good to go. At a minimum, it forces the Panthers to prepare for Rogers, Wright and Cox...and, yes, all teams to spend preparation time on the strengths and weaknesses of the slot corners.

wright was good to go, he was on the 46 man roster, u think they'd sit joe looney or nick moody as inactive if wright wasn't ready to play???? those guys are healthy are ready to contribute and OL injuries would necessitate looney playing so if wright wasn't ready to play he would've been sat

also, when they played DIME...PFF's jeff deeny said cj spillman got the dime reps over eric wright

thank you. that proves injury was a factor then.
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by Janitor:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
and let the reporting tell the truth...

it begins

Matt Barrows @mattbarrows
JH said he was healthy enough to play. Based on that...@nonz: was Eric Wright demoted or held out of yesterday's game because if injury?


lol.


let me guess, he isn't insinuating exactly that wright was demoted...right? lol...

BLIND

no. that's my tweet to Beerows. it fails to answer the question.

and please quit it with the attitude. thanks.

attitude? sorry didn't realize writing "blind" is attitude but you posting ur emoticon isn't hahahaha get a grip boast.

ur answer has already been provided, the writers asked him yesterday if wright was injured, harbaugh said NO and then they asked if that means cox has taken over the job and harbaugh said he doesn't talk about nickle back controversies (harkening back to when he said he doesn't talk about punt returner controversies etc and only position he'd discuss any "controversy" over is qb"

will not understand this support for eric freakin wright haha

emoticon? better check yourself. and yes calling posters blind is a personal attack. last warning iLL. last warning.

yes ur emoticon of a smiley face laughing, that's not "insulting posters" but saying blind is? lol

you call others blind yet can't properly read a forum? ummmmm...
and stop w/ the threats, i've been on this board since it was created and always dealt with posters civilized

it wasn't me who ridiculed people first, i posted the facts as i saw them regarding wright is all initially and the conversation devolved and it wasn't due to me
Originally posted by boast:
thank you. that proves injury was a factor then.

why do you think that? u don't think having joe looney active would be more beneficial than eric wright hurt if injury was a factor????
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
thank you. that proves injury was a factor then.

why do you think that? u don't think having joe looney active would be more beneficial than eric wright hurt if injury was a factor????

against the pass heavy Packers, secondary depth was more important.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
thank you. that proves injury was a factor then.

why do you think that? u don't think having joe looney active would be more beneficial than eric wright hurt if injury was a factor????

against the pass heavy Packers, secondary depth was more important.

what depth? if he's hurt how is that depth??? stop this
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by iLL49er:
Originally posted by boast:
thank you. that proves injury was a factor then.

why do you think that? u don't think having joe looney active would be more beneficial than eric wright hurt if injury was a factor????

against the pass heavy Packers, secondary depth was more important.

what depth? if he's hurt how is that depth??? stop this

"in an emergency" do you have any clue how easy it is to re-injury a hammy in sub freezing temps? have you ever injured your hammy before? also, will you eat crow if he plays over Cox at CAR?
  • kem99
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 586
Originally posted by iLL49er:
wright was good to go, he was on the 46 man roster, u think they'd sit joe looney or nick moody as inactive if wright wasn't ready to play???? those guys are healthy are ready to contribute and OL injuries would necessitate looney playing so if wright wasn't ready to play he would've been sat

also, when they played DIME...PFF's jeff deeny said cj spillman got the dime reps over eric wright

Well...what exactly does "ready to play" mean...the 49ers always dress 7 OL, so Looney wouldn't have dressed unless there was some reason to believe the starters or Kilgore/Snyder might not be able to go. Wright may have dressed in case they absolutely needed him (i.e. Brown, Cox or Brock got knocked out of the game) or, perhaps most likely, they thought he would be able to go, put him on the active 46 man roster 90 minutes before game time and then it turned out he couldn't go.