There are 98 users in the forums

REPORT.... woodson wants to play for niners and is lowering demands

I would take Woodson in a heartbeat! Especially on a 1 year deal he'll be more motivated by either a new contract or this being his last go at it!
come on down to the price is right!!!!
Originally posted by robniner:
Originally posted by cashmahne:
Veteran Minimum or don't sign him IMO.

He sacrifices if he wants to win the ring + prepares us to triologize the Pack!

Could see him really wanting to come back and get at the Packers week 1!
Championship!
  • Wodwo
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,104
Huh... I figured this thread would be locked or moved by now. Shows what I know.
Almost expected to sign in today and read about Woodson's signing. Should be any day now.
I think, an agreement is secretely done and he signs after the draft.

We'll probably draft 2 S, one in the 2nd and a sleeper. He'll be a mentor like Mos was.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
I'm down, better than Dahl

dahl is younger, can play both spots and is good on special teams. woodson can not play special teams, he is also to old, no in my opinion he does not fit into our plans no matter how much he and some fans wish

Dahl is terrible at safety. So, you may say he can play both spots, but he can't play either spot well. This is an awful argument.
Yeah, I'll pass on all white safeties... sorry.
He will definitely be a Niner. Hopefully for cheap (ala Nnamdi's contract). I know it'll be a one year gig, but would like him to stick around for 2 years with a smooth transition to the future guy.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,847
Originally posted by MCrabs15:
Originally posted by cciowa:
dahl is younger, can play both spots and is good on special teams. woodson can not play special teams, he is also to old, no in my opinion he does not fit into our plans no matter how much he and some fans wish

How the hell would you know how he fits into our plans. He's one of greatest dbs ever and the niners have shown they have some interest in him. If Harbaalke wants him, I'm on board.
charles of five ago fits your description of him in regards to one of the best ever,,, he is not that anymore and does not fit into our plans
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,847
Originally posted by tohara3:
Originally posted by robniner:
Originally posted by cashmahne:
Veteran Minimum or don't sign him IMO.

He sacrifices if he wants to win the ring + prepares us to triologize the Pack!

Could see him really wanting to come back and get at the Packers week 1!
i think that is what will happen,, no body wants him and he will crawl back to the pack, if they even want him. his time is done
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,847
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
I'm down, better than Dahl

dahl is younger, can play both spots and is good on special teams. woodson can not play special teams, he is also to old, no in my opinion he does not fit into our plans no matter how much he and some fans wish

Dahl is terrible at safety. So, you may say he can play both spots, but he can't play either spot well. This is an awful argument.
he is a decent back up in two positions plus he plays special teams. you can judge him in a rams uniform if you want but once they are in a niner uniform its a different ball game. if he is so "terrible", why did the coaches and front office, who we are always told to trust, sign him? I can not understand how some people still do not get it. the players this regime signs are signed for a reason. dahh is not going to be a hall of famer like charles will be but he was signed for a reason and i just happen to think you do not hate a player in a niner uniform untill they give you a reason. this whole charles thing is silly,. we will draft a hot shot rookie who will end up starting game one.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
I'm down, better than Dahl

dahl is younger, can play both spots and is good on special teams. woodson can not play special teams, he is also to old, no in my opinion he does not fit into our plans no matter how much he and some fans wish

Dahl is terrible at safety. So, you may say he can play both spots, but he can't play either spot well. This is an awful argument.
he is a decent back up in two positions plus he plays special teams. you can judge him in a rams uniform if you want but once they are in a niner uniform its a different ball game. if he is so "terrible", why did the coaches and front office, who we are always told to trust, sign him? I can not understand how some people still do not get it. the players this regime signs are signed for a reason. dahh is not going to be a hall of famer like charles will be but he was signed for a reason and i just happen to think you do not hate a player in a niner uniform untill they give you a reason. this whole charles thing is silly,. we will draft a hot shot rookie who will end up starting game one.

even if we did draft a rookie in 1st, he wouldn't be a guaranteed starter. aldon was a 3rd down specialist as a rookie, and Jenkins didn't even catch a ball yet. not saying we absolutely need to sign him, but woodson could have a role as a leader at minimum.
Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
I'm down, better than Dahl

dahl is younger, can play both spots and is good on special teams. woodson can not play special teams, he is also to old, no in my opinion he does not fit into our plans no matter how much he and some fans wish

Dahl is terrible at safety. So, you may say he can play both spots, but he can't play either spot well. This is an awful argument.
he is a decent back up in two positions plus he plays special teams. you can judge him in a rams uniform if you want but once they are in a niner uniform its a different ball game. if he is so "terrible", why did the coaches and front office, who we are always told to trust, sign him? I can not understand how some people still do not get it. the players this regime signs are signed for a reason. dahh is not going to be a hall of famer like charles will be but he was signed for a reason and i just happen to think you do not hate a player in a niner uniform untill they give you a reason. this whole charles thing is silly,. we will draft a hot shot rookie who will end up starting game one.

even if we did draft a rookie in 1st, he wouldn't be a guaranteed starter. aldon was a 3rd down specialist as a rookie, and Jenkins didn't even catch a ball yet. not saying we absolutely need to sign him, but woodson could have a role as a leader at minimum.

Anthony Davis and Mike Iupati both instantly started because the people in their spots were terrible. A top rated safety would be looking at the same thing.
Share 49erswebzone