Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
The Pen is blue CC
Now THAT is funny as all get out there!!!!!
There are 197 users in the forums
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
The Pen is blue CC
Originally posted by 49Fever:
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Is your point : this is a blatant personal foul by hitting a defensless receiver in the head with the top of his helmet ?
OK i agree
Originally posted by Beeker:
Originally posted by 49Fever:
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Is your point : this is a blatant personal foul by hitting a defensless receiver in the head with the top of his helmet ?
OK i agree
And in all actuality, it SHOULD have been a catch and fumble out of bounds at the 3. But then we have that pesky Calvin Johnson rule LOL
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
he should've acted unconscious after that. Then they'd HAVE to throw the flag.
Originally posted by AmpLee:Amazing that wasn't called
Originally posted by 49erRider:
The thing about that is it was within 5 yards. That one is actually disputable. The plays in question here are not. They are blatant.
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Originally posted by AmpLee:I believe the general rule of thumb on making a "football move" is two steps. He only takes one step before he gets clocked. It's just another bad non-call, period. It's almost like they were going to let the Ravens do whatever they wanted to to prevent that Niner touchdown.
There are only two possible outcomes in this play. If the refs ruled that Crabtree made a football move with the ball, he is no longer defenseless and the result is a fumble out of bounds at the three. If the refs rule that Crabtree was defenseless because there was no football move it's an incomplete pass and a helmet to helmet penalty. There exists no gray area for the ruling to be an incomplete pass without a penalty.
Originally posted by GNielsen:
This is pouring salt on the wound. Has to be one of the worst performances by the refs I've ever seen in a Super Bowl. It's worse than the Seahawks-Steelers and that was a debacle. It's real hard not to come to the conclusion that the refs just didn't want the Niners to get that last TD. I mean every time something like that happened all season it's hands-down half the distance to the goal, first and goal.
Originally posted by GNielsen:
Originally posted by AmpLee:I believe the general rule of thumb on making a "football move" is two steps. He only takes one step before he gets clocked. It's just another bad non-call, period. It's almost like they were going to let the Ravens do whatever they wanted to to prevent that Niner touchdown.
There are only two possible outcomes in this play. If the refs ruled that Crabtree made a football move with the ball, he is no longer defenseless and the result is a fumble out of bounds at the three. If the refs rule that Crabtree was defenseless because there was no football move it's an incomplete pass and a helmet to helmet penalty. There exists no gray area for the ruling to be an incomplete pass without a penalty.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by monsterzero789:sorry but i said nothing wrong. the coaches did craw into a fetal position at the end of the game. I know i am in the minority here with my views but people in the minority are usually able to see things more clearly then those in the majority
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by AmpLee:if you want to play the game you gotta catch the ball luv. all year long our team was touted as the bullies of the nfl. well the ravens were the ones who punched us in the mouth and our reaction or the coaches reaction at the end, was to crawl into a fetal position
Originally posted by guillotine31:
He either caught it and fumbled (which wasn't called) or its helmet to helmet on a defenseless receiver/incomplete pass. Which was it? All they called was an incomplete pass, which is not the accurate call, in my opinion. It's not really complaining. I think people just want clarity for the future.