Originally posted by NCommand:
Funny how he had an "off year" but again was tops in sacks. And at least he was consistent game-to-game and as always, had clutch plays for us that secured wins. Meanwhile, Aldon and Lynch had long stretches where they may have gotten some pressure but didn't close the deal (sacks). Lynch still needs to work on his conditioning so that he can do it every down and Aldon needs to be mentally motivated...he fell off considerably after McDonald was let go. Brooks still remains our most consistent OLB and is very reliable and still is top 3-5 in the NFL at the SAM. SAM is a very difficult role to play in our defense but that was under Fangio. We don't know what Mangini's defense will look like (i.e. more disguise, bigger beef up front, more blitzing, more drop backs in zone, etc.).
Obviously, ideally, we'll try to restructure him and keep him as a PT starter/key depth but that may be difficult. We could let him go, test the market and come back if nobody bites. Trade? I don't anyone will pick up that salary now.
Brooks had much longer stretches where he got no pressure. In fact, he got the least pressure of all our OLBs that saw significant playing time per snap and was near the bottom of the league in that respect.
Brook is not that difficult to replace. If Lynch needs to improve his conditioning what's that mean for Brooks, who was probably in the worst shape of anyone on the team that doesn't play along the line?
[ Edited by Evilgenius on Mar 2, 2015 at 4:34 PM ]