Originally posted by fly15:
they can sign all of the above including A. johnson, it wont matter..... they all need a quality qb
This thread is about FA opportunities.
There are 172 users in the forums
Originally posted by fly15:
they can sign all of the above including A. johnson, it wont matter..... they all need a quality qb
Originally posted by FL9er:Now FL, not a knock on fly. But at the same time, you know we cant have any thread, it's sad to say, that talks about the offense, and they dont bring up Alex. We can be talking about Goodwin snapping the ball, and just Goodwin, and someone will be like well look who he's hiking the ball off too. WE just gotta take the good with the bad. Fortunately for us, more people are focused now (i hope) on the success of us as a team now, rather then the lack of a player, that helped guide us to 13-3, and the NFC West crown. And also notice i said helped guide, not lead all by himself. lol
Originally posted by fly15:
they can sign all of the above including A. johnson, it wont matter..... they all need a quality qb
This thread is about FA opportunities.
Originally posted by IdahoNiner:
Plaxico fits the role of a 1-2 year contracted vet that can come in and fill the need while the rookie developes to take over full time. Plaxico IMO is worth a shot. It not like Sanchez and that jest offense was lighting the world on fire, and Plax was the only one struggleing..
Originally posted by fly15:they can sign all of the above including A. johnson, it wont matter..... they all need a quality qb
Originally posted by aman49:
Originally posted by fly15:
they can sign all of the above including A. johnson, it wont matter..... they all need a quality qb
You know, if you weren't such a flagrant troll there wouldn't be multiple posts/threads where people demand that you are banned.
Originally posted by five1oh:
Originally posted by IdahoNiner:
Plaxico fits the role of a 1-2 year contracted vet that can come in and fill the need while the rookie developes to take over full time. Plaxico IMO is worth a shot. It not like Sanchez and that jest offense was lighting the world on fire, and Plax was the only one struggleing..
I see what you did there
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Thanks, AB, you just saved me time responding. A question for you is, do you like the idea of schidt canning craps...and his $4.5 mil/yr (or thereabouts), trying to sign wallace for about $9mil/yr, thus spending a net $4.5mil/yr more for obtaining Wallace and getting rid of craps and his lackluster #4WR production. We would have to also sign a good hands guy with our first pick, or even trade up ....but keeping craps around for $4.5 and producing like a #4 WR just seems to be a bad deal for us capwise. Getting rid of his salary ...or as mentioned trying to get steelers to take a guy signed for $4.5 for a couple yrs(which would help their cap problem) and us taking on wallace and his $9 mil/yr would really just incr our payroll by $4.5. The other thing would have to be a big slug of late rd picks as WR campmeat plus get every possible UDFA WR in camp for at least a couple days look see....and then we might just get a couple guys with good hands that don't cost much money. I , like you, am absolutely sure we have to get wallace or someone like him, or we end up paying hi $$ to untested hi pick WR( would necessitate trade up), and still we could end up with Rashaun Woods part II. It doesn't make sense to not take a tried and true WR in FA, unless Coach and baalke are dead sure they can pick us up a #1, #2, and a #4 or #5 just from draft.
We already know that H&B are aware we need that #1 WR , and hence they tried to make it go with Braylon....didn't work but it does show they know craps is a #3 WR at best, and maybe a #4 or #5. Spending $4.5 per yr on him is a waste of good $$. Dropping his salary means we could pick up a wallace at a net salary incr of $4.5/yr, and that is exactly what i think our guys are going to do...unless pissburg would take craps in trade as a #3 WR or #4, to meet their cap requirements. I never meant to say that pissburg would consider craps as a #1 WR, but they got a cap problem, even tho 7 or more of their guys have restructured their contracts(incl rottenbergetr) to try and get under the cap.It would just put the onus on them to try and find a #1 WR or a #2 in the draft.
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Thanks, AB, you just saved me time responding. A question for you is, do you like the idea of schidt canning craps...and his $4.5 mil/yr (or thereabouts), trying to sign wallace for about $9mil/yr, thus spending a net $4.5mil/yr more for obtaining Wallace and getting rid of craps and his lackluster #4WR production. We would have to also sign a good hands guy with our first pick, or even trade up ....but keeping craps around for $4.5 and producing like a #4 WR just seems to be a bad deal for us capwise. Getting rid of his salary ...or as mentioned trying to get steelers to take a guy signed for $4.5 for a couple yrs(which would help their cap problem) and us taking on wallace and his $9 mil/yr would really just incr our payroll by $4.5. The other thing would have to be a big slug of late rd picks as WR campmeat plus get every possible UDFA WR in camp for at least a couple days look see....and then we might just get a couple guys with good hands that don't cost much money. I , like you, am absolutely sure we have to get wallace or someone like him, or we end up paying hi $$ to untested hi pick WR( would necessitate trade up), and still we could end up with Rashaun Woods part II. It doesn't make sense to not take a tried and true WR in FA, unless Coach and baalke are dead sure they can pick us up a #1, #2, and a #4 or #5 just from draft.
We already know that H&B are aware we need that #1 WR , and hence they tried to make it go with Braylon....didn't work but it does show they know craps is a #3 WR at best, and maybe a #4 or #5. Spending $4.5 per yr on him is a waste of good $$. Dropping his salary means we could pick up a wallace at a net salary incr of $4.5/yr, and that is exactly what i think our guys are going to do...unless pissburg would take craps in trade as a #3 WR or #4, to meet their cap requirements. I never meant to say that pissburg would consider craps as a #1 WR, but they got a cap problem, even tho 7 or more of their guys have restructured their contracts(incl rottenbergetr) to try and get under the cap.It would just put the onus on them to try and find a #1 WR or a #2 in the draft.
This is what you call "saving time responding?".........