Guys, what makes you think that scheming against the Pat and/or Packers would be any different than what we've done offensively and defensively against let's say the Lions? IMO, we would apply the same D with more blitzing to bring pressure to both Brady and Rodgers. We would play the pass and allow Willis and Bowman to take care of the middle while the DBs jam the LOS and take care of the back end.
Remember how frickin' Parcells would ground and pound us in the 80s and our passing game and Joe would be defunct. Damn, Joe Morris would gash us and both our Ds would go off. I remember a very low scoring game one year against those mofos. Brutal!!!
To be honest, I would expect our D to dictate the terms against both Rodgers and Brady. We would try to do the same we did against the Lions. Sure those two will get their yards, but not their TDs.
On offense, we would ground and pound with a little trickery like a reverse to soften up their Ds. We would find a way to be up and then pound them unmercifully to the ground in the fourth keeping both of those QBs OFF the field.
The key against Brady and Rodgers has always been pressure.
IMO, Harbaugh in just his first six games has proven he knows how to coach and especially scheme.
McCarthy and Bellicheat would have a fight on their hands. IMO, the Pats are more apt to have a dog fight than GB. These two contests would be low scoring with the first to 20 winning.
Seriously though, out of all the teams in the league, we are built to address, survive and prevail against both of those teams, now.