Media and the 49ers

Originally posted by English:
Hawker, I can't imagine all that many guys from here rushed to check out the "Catching up with Russell Wilson" blog. Don't be too disappointed.

LOL i'm not holding my breath.. just thought i should throw some stats out there to back my statement...

Originally posted by hawker84:

Originally posted by English:
Hawker, I can't imagine all that many guys from here rushed to check out the "Catching up with Russell Wilson" blog. Don't be too disappointed.

LOL i'm not holding my breath.. just thought i should throw some stats out there to back my statement...

How DARE you use stats to back up an opinion! Don't you KNOW this is a FAN site????

Don't Curr. Championships are won in January not March.

Double post

Originally posted by English:
Hawker, I can't imagine all that many guys from here rushed to check out the "Catching up with Russell Wilson" blog. Don't be too disappointed.

I know I didn't. I think he forgot what forum he is in.

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
http://49ers.pressdemocrat.com/2013/03/inside-the-49ers/espn-nfl-power-rankings-seahawks-no-1-49ers-no-2/


Personally, I don't see how this can be. I know the Sea-buzzards beat us bad when we last played but lets face it, they beat a very tired team, who just beat Brady and his high powered offense that threw 50+ times (please correct me if I'm wrong on that), and a team who had to travel from New England to Seattle in a week. Plus I really feel the Sea-buzzards snuck up on a lot of teams. But with them having a much tougher schedule this coming season (while we have an easier schedule) I think they regress. I really think the Sea-buzzards are grossly over-rated, and the 49ers under-rated. And I think this lack of respect for us is a good motivational tool for JH & Co.

Thoughts?

Contenders win on the road. Pretenders don't.

49ers: 5 - 3
Seahawks: 3 - 5

On the other hand, if the Seahawks get home field in the playoffs, that would make all the difference for them, because they are a different team at home.

That's a great point I forgot to add. With a tougher schedule the "12th man" won't be able to save them. 3 road wins won't cut it in 2013. They aren't sneaking up on no one.

Originally posted by SofaKing:

Originally posted by BrianGO:
Just as importantly, it's the AMOUNT of times that Wilson throws outside of the pocket. He is constantly running around out there; the little devil.

This too. In every game I saw, he was running around a la Fran Tarkenton. He's a pest.

"The pest of the west."

...

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by SofaKing:

Originally posted by BrianGO:
Just as importantly, it's the AMOUNT of times that Wilson throws outside of the pocket. He is constantly running around out there; the little devil.

This too. In every game I saw, he was running around a la Fran Tarkenton. He's a pest.

"The pest of the west."

Lol bet both our games with them will be in primetime this year

Originally posted by KegBert:

Don't Curr. Championships are won in January not March.

February

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by English:
Hawker, I can't imagine all that many guys from here rushed to check out the "Catching up with Russell Wilson" blog. Don't be too disappointed.

I know I didn't. I think he forgot what forum he is in.

There is one?

The thing about Wilson is he is weak in the pocket because he is short.

Originally posted by Young2Rice:
The thing about Wilson is he is weak in the pocket because he is short.

I am anxious to see him try to find Harvin in the pocket when that dude is hard to see when your 6'2". One little guy throwing to another just sounds like it is bound to not work.

Originally posted by Young2Rice:

The thing about Wilson is he is weak in the pocket because he is short.

Even though I have no doubt the 49ers will continue to prove they're the better team, that's just silly. Russell Wilson is far from weak in the pocket. That guy is legit.