Originally posted by unst4bl3:
We want Luck.
(because we need massive defensive help, and mcnabb may be available again or some other FA)
Lets put nate at FS
(he would get owned more there than he does at QB)
"We want Luck."
It doesn't matter if we need "massive defensive help" because we also need a QB, and QB is the single most important position in football whether you want to believe it or not. You don't take a defender based on need when you also need a QB and a prospect like Andrew Luck is on the board. Well, YOU might, but no competent
NFL decision-maker would.
Key word: competent.
If you already have a QB that can get it done, then fine, go defense. We don't have that QB.
The only reason to not want to hear "we want Luck" anymore is the fact that we won't get him. We have too many wins to pick in front of Arizona or Carolina, and they will certainly take him if he declares. Our front office doesn't have the balls to make the trade for him, either. If he doesn't declare, I really hope we aren't in the running for him again next year. He will go #1 overall whenever he comes out.
[ Edited by 49erRider on Dec 19, 2010 at 11:00 PM ]