SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS VS. ST. LOUIS RAMS GAMEDAY THREAD (Week 10) | Page 91

dam if we had a real coaching staff the niners should have had at least another 20 seconds on the clock and a time out. and will ted ginn's soft ass return one of these punts

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1357

m_brockalexander
Veteran
Posts: 13,193

Stop the clock.................then run a draw? Another coaches special.

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1358

TheGoldStandard
Veteran
Posts: 7,697

Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by Bali-Niner:
Originally posted by jrg:
a friend just sent me this

Take it off baby!

she needs the old intentional pounding

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1359

BubbaParisMVP
Veteran
Posts: 3,097

Well, if that wasn't the best first half of Niners football this season, it was awfully close.

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1360

Negrodamus
Veteran
Posts: 13,775

Originally posted by kstolai:
Originally posted by BirdmanJr:
wow sing

Surprised?

you got 19 sec and qb that can chuck the pigskin....yet another draw. amazing grace....couldn't sound any worse.

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1361

Bali-Niner
Veteran
Posts: 12,107

Originally posted by DShanghai69er:
We DO need to run the ball occasionally to set-up the long down-field passes, guys...

And, we DO need to insist on our offensive line to dominate (or, at least, attempt to dominate) the line of scrimmage...

Tell that to the Rams OC..

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1362

209ers
Veteran
Posts: 456

Originally posted by Godsleftsock:
why the f**k did they call a timeout?! In case Gore busted a big one?

thats the basis on which singletary likes to run the ball, he believes at some point, no matter how impossible it looks, that frank will break one big

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1363

zeppfan1
Veteran
Posts: 7,848

Originally posted by leakyfausett:
Why bother with the timeout

because as Sing says, "If I got em I'm gonna use em"

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM

#1364

SoCal9er
Veteran
Posts: 11,496

Originally posted by mr2324jgf:
is it true that if you dont use it.... you lose it??? - Sing

Yep, Sing has lost his mind.

Nov 14, 2010 at 2:42 PM

#1365

craigyboy
Veteran
Posts: 535

Originally posted by rominjoe:
Originally posted by leakyfausett:
Originally posted by rominjoe:
Originally posted by leakyfausett:
Rules say no helmet to helmet contact. All the teams had ref in during camp to work with them on this. A form tackle doesn't involve the helmet anywhere near the defenders helmet play within the rules and there are no problems. Laboy screwed it on both penalties and he got flag sit his a$$ on the bench.

LAboy's awesome, 2nd hardest hitting guy on our Defense. That play happened so fast, he just ended up where he did. An MLB pitcher couldnt find the strike zone on where u can touch a qb without being penalized.

I don't care if he is the hardest hitter (how you came up with the 2nd hardest I don't know) he GAVE the Rams 30YARDS for free.

Well lets see, hes only behind Justin smith n sacks (tied w Paris). Go look at the highlights from the games. He hits hard. I dont have a bruiseometer, I left it at home. Under the bed or n the attic somewhere. When he hits people they look like they r n pain. But yeah man go ahead and bench one of our hungriest D players on the field, go ahead n c what happens. I know 1 of those penalty's was bunk. If u disagree, go back and check how half the webzone groaned about the Sissy NFL rules.

leaky is correct - helmet to helmuts are players pushing the edge. but rules are rules and now they say you gotta go back to proper form tackling or you cost the team. if you cant adjust then you sit til you learn.