Originally posted by sacniner:
Smith > Hill.
There is absolutely nothing that supports your claim. In fact, the numbers (especially the Win/Loss numbers) suggest otherwise.
There are 163 users in the forums
Originally posted by sacniner:
Smith > Hill.
Originally posted by ftbl899:
If we had alex smith for the whole game we would have won this game...whats your point?
Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by Shaj:Originally posted by ads_2006:
yeah, noodles would be killing right now
"noodles" is a better QB than "wonderlic-man", so I'm not sure where you're going with that.
that's why he can't benched in Houston for Smith? I guess everyone has their own opinions, but I just like QBs that are capable of at least attempting all the NFL throws. Hill's arm was too weak. But, he is a good stopgap backup. They shouldn't have traded him.
Attempting (as in capable of) vs. Attempting (actually making the throws) are 2 different things. The fact that Smith can do the first, but not the latter is a telling-tale of why this offense blows......
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
He was having a pretty good day until the injury. Carr certainly isn't better.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
He was having a pretty good day until the injury. Carr certainly isn't better.
Oh I am just eating popcorn waiting for the Smith haters to attempt to reply to this.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
He was having a pretty good day until the injury. Carr certainly isn't better.
Oh I am just eating popcorn waiting for the Smith haters to attempt to reply to this.
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
He was having a pretty good day until the injury. Carr certainly isn't better.
Oh I am just eating popcorn waiting for the Smith haters to attempt to reply to this.
Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by sacniner:
Smith > Hill.
There is absolutely nothing that supports your claim. In fact, the numbers (especially the Win/Loss numbers) suggest otherwise.
Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by Shaj:Originally posted by ads_2006:
yeah, noodles would be killing right now
"noodles" is a better QB than "wonderlic-man", so I'm not sure where you're going with that.
that's why he can't benched in Houston for Smith? I guess everyone has their own opinions, but I just like QBs that are capable of at least attempting all the NFL throws. Hill's arm was too weak. But, he is a good stopgap backup. They shouldn't have traded him.
Attempting (as in capable of) vs. Attempting (actually making the throws) are 2 different things. The fact that Smith can do the first, but not the latter is a telling-tale of why this offense blows......
We've all seen him have flashes of being good. I'm not saying he is all that, but he's a better option than Carr and the mancrush Shaun Hill.
Are people forgetting how terrible Hill looked before he got benched? I think so.
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
He was having a pretty good day until the injury. Carr certainly isn't better.
Oh I am just eating popcorn waiting for the Smith haters to attempt to reply to this.
Yeah as if Smith hasn't lost us games before today.
Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by Shaj:Originally posted by ads_2006:
yeah, noodles would be killing right now
"noodles" is a better QB than "wonderlic-man", so I'm not sure where you're going with that.
that's why he can't benched in Houston for Smith? I guess everyone has their own opinions, but I just like QBs that are capable of at least attempting all the NFL throws. Hill's arm was too weak. But, he is a good stopgap backup. They shouldn't have traded him.
Attempting (as in capable of) vs. Attempting (actually making the throws) are 2 different things. The fact that Smith can do the first, but not the latter is a telling-tale of why this offense blows......
We've all seen him have flashes of being good. I'm not saying he is all that, but he's a better option than Carr and the mancrush Shaun Hill.
Are people forgetting how terrible Hill looked before he got benched? I think so.
How come no one makes the same excuses for Hill like they do for Smith ? Didnt he also have a poor oline ? Didnt he also have Raye calling plays for him ? How come no one was crying for the spread when Hill was behind center ?
Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by KRS-1:Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
He was having a pretty good day until the injury. Carr certainly isn't better.
Oh I am just eating popcorn waiting for the Smith haters to attempt to reply to this.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
We would have probably won if Alex didn't get hurt.
Originally posted by ftbl899:
If we had alex smith for the whole game we would have won this game...whats your point?
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by ZRF80:Originally posted by sacniner:Originally posted by Shaj:Originally posted by ads_2006:
yeah, noodles would be killing right now
"noodles" is a better QB than "wonderlic-man", so I'm not sure where you're going with that.
that's why he can't benched in Houston for Smith? I guess everyone has their own opinions, but I just like QBs that are capable of at least attempting all the NFL throws. Hill's arm was too weak. But, he is a good stopgap backup. They shouldn't have traded him.
Attempting (as in capable of) vs. Attempting (actually making the throws) are 2 different things. The fact that Smith can do the first, but not the latter is a telling-tale of why this offense blows......
We've all seen him have flashes of being good. I'm not saying he is all that, but he's a better option than Carr and the mancrush Shaun Hill.
Are people forgetting how terrible Hill looked before he got benched? I think so.
How come no one makes the same excuses for Hill like they do for Smith ? Didnt he also have a poor oline ? Didnt he also have Raye calling plays for him ? How come no one was crying for the spread when Hill was behind center ?
Sounds like you are making HillEXCUSES...