Is Season Officially Lost If We Lose To Oakland? | Page 4

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:16 AM

#46

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

This season is already lost.

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:16 AM

#47

BETTERDAYZ9ERS
Veteran
Posts: 3,078

Puts another nail in the coffin. But this one would hurt I hate f@ckin Raiders

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM

#48

Shifty
Veteran
Posts: 23,424

In basically any other division our season is done already. However, in what may turn out to be the worst division in NFL history we have a chance right now. If we lose to Oakland? Then yeah no chance.

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM

#49

Kilgore_Trout
Veteran
Posts: 2,150

It isn't over until it is over... Now if you were to ask, "Is it likely over?" I would probably say yes.

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:19 AM

#50

BETTERDAYZ9ERS
Veteran
Posts: 3,078

Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by Hollywood:
Thread starter, this is not directed at you but i'm wondering why so many people keep marking the London game against Denver as a win. Not just a win, but I keep seeing people comment as if the Niners don't even have to show up. Kyle Orton's numbers are better than Brees. He's top 3 in most statistical categories. Brandon Lloyd is leading all receivers. They will have Knownshon Moreno back by then. It's marked as a home game, but it's over sea's, so it's a ROAD game. And we suck on the road. I realize Denver is not a powerhouse, but at 0-5, and seeing how this game is not being played at the stick, I consider Denver to be heavily favored. Especially since our secondary is so weak and the complete lack of a pass rush. I thought this team could go 10-6 if they could steal either the NOL or ATL game. They failed to do so. Not only that, they lost to Seattle and Philly. At this point. I think we lose the Denver game, the Green Bay game and either one AZ or STL game. I know we have owned the Cards in the past, but they always play us tough regardless. And lets face it, St Louis gives us fits no matter how bad they suck when we play them in St Louis. Bradford is out playing Smith. I just don't see us finishing better than 9-7. 8-8 if we are lucky.

Bradford - 1159 Yards 56.7%COMP 6TD's 8INT's, sacked 11 times. QB rating 66.5
Smith - 1229 Yards 62.1%COMP 6TD's 9INT's, sacked 10 times. QB rating 71.6

Although Bradford will definitely be the better NFL QB no doubt.

You know a better stat?

Bradford=2 wins
Smith=0

Who has the better team around them?

I'm not gonna get sucked in to this but he said Bradford has outplayed Smith and Smith has better #'s. That's it.

Like I said the only thing that matters to me is wins and losses.

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:19 AM

#51

49erForLife420
Veteran
Posts: 456

Need a win for our Pride 0-5 is killin me.... idk what il do if we fall to 0-6

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM

#52

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 127,829

If they don't win it could get real ugly

If they do win they will have the same record as the cowboys or vikings lol

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM

#53

Shifty
Veteran
Posts: 23,424

Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by Hollywood:
Thread starter, this is not directed at you but i'm wondering why so many people keep marking the London game against Denver as a win. Not just a win, but I keep seeing people comment as if the Niners don't even have to show up. Kyle Orton's numbers are better than Brees. He's top 3 in most statistical categories. Brandon Lloyd is leading all receivers. They will have Knownshon Moreno back by then. It's marked as a home game, but it's over sea's, so it's a ROAD game. And we suck on the road. I realize Denver is not a powerhouse, but at 0-5, and seeing how this game is not being played at the stick, I consider Denver to be heavily favored. Especially since our secondary is so weak and the complete lack of a pass rush. I thought this team could go 10-6 if they could steal either the NOL or ATL game. They failed to do so. Not only that, they lost to Seattle and Philly. At this point. I think we lose the Denver game, the Green Bay game and either one AZ or STL game. I know we have owned the Cards in the past, but they always play us tough regardless. And lets face it, St Louis gives us fits no matter how bad they suck when we play them in St Louis. Bradford is out playing Smith. I just don't see us finishing better than 9-7. 8-8 if we are lucky.

Bradford - 1159 Yards 56.7%COMP 6TD's 8INT's, sacked 11 times. QB rating 66.5
Smith - 1229 Yards 62.1%COMP 6TD's 9INT's, sacked 10 times. QB rating 71.6

Although Bradford will definitely be the better NFL QB no doubt.

You know a better stat?

Bradford=2 wins
Smith=0

Who has the better team around them?

I'm not gonna get sucked in to this but he said Bradford has outplayed Smith and Smith has better #'s. That's it.

Like I said the only thing that matters to me is wins and losses.

Fair enough, then Trent Dilfers year where the Ravens won the Superbowl, he outplayed any of Dan Marinos seasons, yes?

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM

#54

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

Originally posted by 49erForLife420:
Need a win for our Pride 0-5 is killin me.... idk what il do if we fall to 0-6

im gonna punch 3 infant babies if that happens

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM

#55

Shifty
Veteran
Posts: 23,424

Originally posted by 49erForLife420:
Need a win for our Pride 0-5 is killin me.... idk what il do if we fall to 0-6

Then a week 7 matchup of the 0-6 49ers @ the 0-5 Panthers. Yikes.

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM

#56

SanFranAddic
Veteran
Posts: 3,418

Yes. I think the players will stop believing in each other and the coaching staff if we lose to Oakland.

The next question is, will they visibly quit on Singletary and get him fired before the end of the season?

Oct 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM

#57