Originally posted by Leathaface:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by SJniner7:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by SJniner7:
Originally posted by 49ersNoKaOi:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
4 Ints because of Tree(seems to have worked itself out)
5 Fumbles because of Gore.
1 Fumble due to Walker.
1 Fumble from Clements.
That's 8 turnovers left 4 of which are DEFINITELY on Smith.
So Smith has 4 definite to his credit.
So changing QB is really going to fix a big part of the problem? Don't make me laugh.
~Ceadder
Beautiful, you should be a lawyer.
Jeez! All I can respond with is WOW! The guy has 9 INTs and 1 fumble, and you think he is only to blame for 4? That is just amazing...
3 INTs' were DEFINITELY Smith's fault. 2 to Gore. And one that was headed to Morgan that got picked cleanly off the carpet.
1 Fumble was DEFINITELY Smith's fault.
Tree caused FOUR of his Interceptions.
That's 8 Turnovers.
The final one being to Ginn who I think should have turned around earlier. I think that if Ginn had indeed turned around when he was supposed to that he should have been able to make a play on the ball. That one to me is 50/50 because I played Receiver and IMHO that's on both of them. Was it underthrown? Possibly. But my job as a Receiver on a Go route is to look back when I near the end of my route. Ginn didn't turn around until it was too late for him to catch the Pass. Smith COULD have gone to Davis but Collinsworth pointed out that Davis was covered too. The INT did set Davis up for a later attempt on the same play though so all was not completely f@cked up by that INT.
Oh and as a former Receiver, I will call em all straight up instead of dropping it all in the QBs' lap.
T.O. used to do that crap to Garcia all the time when he would tip uncatchable Passes up in the air and man it pisses me off when other Receivers do it too. So as a rule I don't play that garbage. Be straight up. Your Receiver goes to the turf because he slipped is that the QBs' fault on timing routes? Nope. How bout when it hits them in the numbers? Nope. Sorry but those are all on Tree. Just like when he overran his route to the Sideline instead of cutting it off at the break. When you are unprepared it shows up in your technique EVERY time.
~Ceadder
Oh Ceadder, are you related to Smith or something? I just don't understand the blind homerism...
All 4 INTs to crabtree were off-target throws. The first off his shoulder(SEA), the second off target (crabtree, smith, and Sing acknowledged Crabtree ran the correct route)(SEA), the third was more of a great defensive play (but still thrown by Smith)(KC), and I am not sure what #4 is... I hope your not removing blame from Smith for the tipped Dline ball
As far as the Ginn INT, please rewatch the highlight. The pass was short, and a bad read at that. Ginn was covered, and the only place the ball should have been thrown is the corner of the end zone, not 5 yards inside the sideline, wayyy short.
If you really can't see this, then it is a difference of you saying toe-mah-toe and me saying toe-may-toe
The one on the shoulder pad was that off target?
Cannot say that 3 of them were definitively off target cause Tree was laying on the grass.
Nor the one where he overran his route.
So technically that would be 5. I blame 4 of them on Tree. If you know the conditions of the field you should not be slipping. Especially if you have interchangeable studs on your feet.
Now if this is an equipment issue and Tree did notify the Equipment Manager, then I can't say with 100% certainty that it was all on Tree. But I definitely cannot put it on the QB because the Pass is supposed to be out of there before the Receiver cuts his route off or completes the exchange. I do think that 1 of the Interceptions was an early hit by the DB. Which is why I don't count 1. I do try to be fair accross the board. Not just where Smith is concerned.
Anyone that Posted in the Harris threads knows that I try to be fair. This is not just a Smith issue where I am concerned. I wish people would stop insinuating that it is. It's not.
~Ceadder
Now he's blaming the equipment manager for Smith's INTs! Ceadder, keep posting, I love it!
I said I don't blame Smith for those INTs'. He still is credited with them. So please do me a favor, go take a walk off a short pier.
You're making fun at my expense cause you wanna be a Tool about Smith having 9 INTs' and you blame the guy for making throws that got Intercepted.
Your point is that he should have known that his Idiot WR1 was going to the turf, didn't know his assignment and can't catch a simple comebacker.
If that's what motivates you then fine so be it they are on Smith. But I don't think he should be cut because of that kind of stupidity.
I'm done with the fools that think like this. I was never making the argument that those need to go to the guy that caused the Int. Sheer foolishness.
And just another tact of people who feel Smith is completely to blame for our problems. When the argument makes sense convolute the argument by making fun of the people who make the argument.
~Ceadder