There are 230 users in the forums
Originally posted by cools:
Teams will sometimes carry only two QB's, especially if they have a 3rd they like on the PS
That article from whitlock shed some light on what may be Nates problem,
Wonder who were gonna sign? prob an ILB
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
This only happens when you have a head coach who has no clue about the value of quarterback play. The league has change, but Sing hasn't.
Haters will hate, but we will regret letting this kid walk away. Give Nate a solid head coach/QB mentor, some time/patience to develop behind a veteran QB and he could turn into a star.
Originally posted by cwilson830:Originally posted by cools:
Teams will sometimes carry only two QB's, especially if they have a 3rd they like on the PS
That article from whitlock shed some light on what may be Nates problem,
Wonder who were gonna sign? prob an ILB
Do we have a possible emergency qb that would allow us to only keep 2? We had what, four emergency qbs last year and they've all been cut/released?
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:Originally posted by OnTheClock:
I think this was strategic. But whether it was or not, I don't particularly agree with the team sticking with 2 QB's. Who knows where Nate was exactly in his development, but one horrendous game was enough to break Davis.
If we can find a competent backup -- not David Carr -- to Smith, and if Alex excels, this release will be meaningless. Unless, however, Nate Davis goes to another team and apparently was not as "dumb" as he was made out to be and lights it up. But the chances of that aren't great.
2 QB's only is very risky IMO. Sometimes your QB's really get banged. I hope they don't get Rocky Bernarded this year...
Originally posted by global_nomad:
I bet he goes home to Indy, and develops behind Payton Manning.
Originally posted by global_nomad:
I bet he goes home to Indy, and develops behind Payton Manning.
Originally posted by Afrikan:Originally posted by fastforward:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Why in the world do people get THIS worked up over a 3rd string QB?
Because his physical talents could make him a superstar.
Like I said, he just needs to be taught the right way (hands-on).
Nobody in the NFL has time to babysit a QB (or any player for that matter.)
we did that for 5 years with Alex, gave him everything he could want....and he never had to earn a starting job.....as well as got rid of QBs that could compete with him, but instead brought in guys like Trent Dilfer and David Carr and Ken Dorsey....lol.
Originally posted by PatrickJira411:+1Originally posted by cwilson830:Originally posted by cools:
Teams will sometimes carry only two QB's, especially if they have a 3rd they like on the PS
That article from whitlock shed some light on what may be Nates problem,
Wonder who were gonna sign? prob an ILB
Do we have a possible emergency qb that would allow us to only keep 2? We had what, four emergency qbs last year and they've all been cut/released?
Patrick Willis can play QB if need be
Originally posted by Draftology:
I think Rhett Bomar got put on the Giants' practice squad
