How bad is that 2008 draft looking? | Page 6

Sep 3, 2010 at 8:05 PM

SnakePlissken
Veteran
Posts: 15,028

Jesus Christ, almost 70% of McCloughan's garbage from 2006-2008 is not apart of the 2010 scheme of things.

Oct 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM

global_nomad
Veteran
Posts: 14,827

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by Schulzy:
It's still too early. If Morgan and Chilo can be solid contributors, it turns out to be a pretty decent draft.

If not - well, then it's a terrible draft.

Morgan is horrible and slow. Chilo is wildly inconsistent. If that's the best we got out of that draft then we busted altogether.

Oct 4, 2010 at 5:27 PM

#78

chico49erfan
Veteran
Posts: 13,961

This draft was a pile of steaming donkey s**t.

[ Edited by chico49erfan on Oct 4, 2010 at 5:27 PM ]

Oct 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM

#79

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Lets thank McClueless for this.

All together now:

Thanks McClueless !

Oct 4, 2010 at 5:52 PM

#80

B650
Veteran
Posts: 4,205

Originally posted by chico49erfan:
This draft was a pile of steaming donkey s**t.

I don't know, I mean, eventually steaming donkey s**t can be somewhat useful (manure).

Steaming donkey s**t > 2008 draft.

Oct 4, 2010 at 5:56 PM

#81

txniner2
Veteran
Posts: 349

Originally posted by B650:
Originally posted by chico49erfan:
This draft was a pile of steaming donkey s**t.

I don't know, I mean, eventually steaming donkey s**t can be somewhat useful (manure).

Steaming donkey s**t > 2008 draft.

Yes I concur with the donkey s*** theory

Oct 4, 2010 at 10:24 PM

#82

LAFortyNinerfan
Veteran
Posts: 3,644

Originally posted by B650:
Originally posted by chico49erfan:
This draft was a pile of steaming donkey s**t.

I don't know, I mean, eventually steaming donkey s**t can be somewhat useful (manure).

Steaming donkey s**t > 2008 draft.

Oct 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM

#83

Brew
Veteran
Posts: 35,488

Originally posted by LAFortyNinerfan:
Originally posted by B650:
Originally posted by chico49erfan:
This draft was a pile of steaming donkey s**t.

I don't know, I mean, eventually steaming donkey s**t can be somewhat useful (manure).

Steaming donkey s**t > 2008 draft.

Oct 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM

#84

TXNinerFan52
Veteran
Posts: 602

Josh Morgan is a 3rd down receiver at best, he brings nothing special to the table.

Oct 6, 2010 at 9:03 AM

#85

swim4speed
Veteran
Posts: 262

balmer was a horrible, horrible pick! Chilo is not good, but is a pet project of Singletary. Morgan is not good, but Singletary likes his blocking. Reggie Smith still has potential to be productive. He'll probably start next season after Goldson leaves.

Oct 6, 2010 at 1:48 PM

#86

zeppfan1
Veteran
Posts: 7,856

Morgan is ok for a sixth round pick. Is he a no. 1 or 2 probably not but he can be productive. I really feel Alex Smith slowing these guys' production.

Oct 6, 2010 at 2:02 PM

#87

backontop
Veteran
Posts: 14,346

Chilo is a scrub and Morgan needs to be benched for Zeigler.

Oct 6, 2010 at 2:05 PM

#88

Shifty
Veteran
Posts: 23,424

I wanted DeSean Jackson and Quentin Groves instead of Balmer and Rachal. Oh well.

Thank God we have Baalke now, who nailed the 2010 draft.

Oct 6, 2010 at 2:17 PM

#89

Norcal9erfan
Veteran
Posts: 2,566

Originally posted by susweel:
Lets thank McClueless for this.

All together now:

Thanks McClueless !

You mean McGlugGlug?

Oct 6, 2010 at 3:46 PM

#90

Shifty
Veteran
Posts: 23,424

2009 was kinda bad too.

Crabtree is just looking ok right now, RJF looks like a real nice 7th round pick and McKillop makes for a nice backup. Coffee retired and Nate Davis wasnt even claimed by any of the 31 other teams.