To review, I'm breaking down the amount of blue- (those among the top 10 at their position) and red-chip players (top 15) on each team. Along with the players, I am also identifying six blue-chip coaches (more on this later).
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
Blue-chip players: LB Patrick Willis, TE Vernon Davis and P Andy Lee.
Red-chip players: Nickel rusher Manny Lawson, nickel DT Justin Smith, DE Isaac Sopoaga, FS Dashon Goldson NT Aubrayo Franklin and RB Frank Gore.
The 49ers finished fourth in the league in points allowed and in examining their list, it is easy to see why they were so good defensively. They have young talent that can control the line of scrimmage. Still, their ability to take the next step depends on quarterback Alex Smith playing well for 16 games.
The Dumbass Link
Very interesting list, it is purely his opinions and it shows. Frank Gore is one of the top 5 running backs IMO but he has him listed as below top 10. Also very interesting that he included Manny Lawson, who I think is a great and underrated player on this board.
Thoughts?
There are 210 users in the forums
Michael Lombardi says Willis is top 10 Frank Gore is not...
Jul 23, 2010 at 6:41 AM
- Chief
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,271
Jul 23, 2010 at 6:46 AM
- Youngone
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,417
Originally posted by Chief:
To review, I'm breaking down the amount of blue- (those among the top 10 at their position) and red-chip players (top 15) on each team. Along with the players, I am also identifying six blue-chip coaches (more on this later).
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
Blue-chip players: LB Patrick Willis, TE Vernon Davis and P Andy Lee.
Red-chip players: Nickel rusher Manny Lawson, nickel DT Justin Smith, DE Isaac Sopoaga, FS Dashon Goldson NT Aubrayo Franklin and RB Frank Gore.
The 49ers finished fourth in the league in points allowed and in examining their list, it is easy to see why they were so good defensively. They have young talent that can control the line of scrimmage. Still, their ability to take the next step depends on quarterback Alex Smith playing well for 16 games.
The Dumbass Link
Very interesting list, it is purely his opinions and it shows. Frank Gore is one of the top 5 running backs IMO but he has him listed as below top 10. Also very interesting that he included Manny Lawson, who I think is a great and underrated player on this board.
Thoughts?
Frank Gore was 6th last year in total yards. He is top 10 RB no doubt. Running back doesn't get as much credit for total yards as they should.
Jul 23, 2010 at 6:47 AM
- Chief
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,271
Here are some of his "blue chip" running backs, so these are guys I'm guessing he thinks are better than our Frank Gore...
DeAngelo Williams
Steven Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Ray Rice
Cedric Benson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Ricky Williams
Chris Johnson
DeAngelo Williams
Steven Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Ray Rice
Cedric Benson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Ricky Williams
Chris Johnson
Jul 23, 2010 at 6:48 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
Frank Gore is gonna make opposing teams eat his duck. f**k YOU NFL
Jul 23, 2010 at 6:50 AM
- Youngone
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,417
Originally posted by Chief:
Here are some of his "blue chip" running backs, so these are guys I'm guessing he thinks are better than our Frank Gore...
DeAngelo Williams
Steven Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Ray Rice
Cedric Benson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Ricky Williams
Chris Johnson
LOL
Can't believe he took Benson and Williams (Ricky) over Frank. Deangelo has been good but not for as long as Frank. Plus Ray Rice had 1 good year. Either way it should go like this
Chris Johnson
Adrian Peterson
Steven Jackson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Frank Gore
DeAngelo Williams
Ray Rice
Ricky Williams
Cedric Benson
[ Edited by Youngone on Jul 23, 2010 at 6:50 AM ]
Jul 23, 2010 at 6:50 AM
- NJNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 248
I personally love it. It's just more fuel to keep the fire in Frank's heart going.
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM
- Chief
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,271
lol, I just noticed the Andy Lee love!
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:02 AM
- PacTiger
- Member
- Posts: 30,146
I agree about lawson but with a caveat. If lawson played on a team that used a 4-3 he would be one of the better olb's.
There is no way I take cedrick benson ahead of frank.
There is no way I take cedrick benson ahead of frank.
[ Edited by fister30 on Jul 23, 2010 at 7:03 AM ]
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:06 AM
- Youngone
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,417
Originally posted by fister30:
I agree about lawson but with a caveat. If lawson played on a team that used a 4-3 he would be one of the better olb's.
There is no way I take cedrick benson ahead of frank.
Nah, Lawson would've been a defensive end in a 4-3 attack
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:08 AM
- elguapo
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,083
Originally posted by Chief:
Here are some of his "blue chip" running backs, so these are guys I'm guessing he thinks are better than our Frank Gore...
DeAngelo Williams
Steven Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Ray Rice
Cedric Benson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Ricky Williams
Chris Johnson
Definitely not Williams and Benson and Jackson. Rice maybe.
The top 5 are CJ
Peterson
Jones Drew
Gore
Rice
Out of these rb's Gore has done the 2nd best with the worst OL out of the bunch. He has a great avg, yards running and receiving, longest runs with CJ and Drew NOT PETERSON, and missed 3 games! WOW!
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:25 AM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 30,016
Kinda weird to put Nickel Pass rusher Manny Lawson being that in nickel pass rush situations is exactly when he comes off the field for Brooks.
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:40 AM
- GoreGoreGore
- 10HourChicken
- Posts: 54,083
D. Williams is a beast, he is better than Gore, if you disagree you haven't seen the Panthers play too much. With that said, Gore is at least top 10, you can argue for top 5 as well.
Jul 23, 2010 at 7:59 AM
- SoCold
- Hall of Dumb
- Posts: 127,660
Originally posted by Chief:
Here are some of his "blue chip" running backs, so these are guys I'm guessing he thinks are better than our Frank Gore...
DeAngelo Williams
Steven Jackson
Adrian Peterson
Ray Rice
Cedric Benson
Maurice Jones-Drew
Ricky Williams
Chris Johnson
De Will had almost the exact same stat line as Gore last year
Steven Jack had 296 more rushing yards than Gore Jackson had 95 more carries than Gore
thats basically the list of the top 8 rb in yards per game without Thomas Jones who was 4th and Ricky was 15th Gore was 9th
if he's talking 'blue chip' that should mean top 10 guys in the league at each position
just dumb
Jul 23, 2010 at 8:06 AM
- NoOffseason
- Veteran
- Posts: 307
Well, at first I was only a little infuriated, but now after studying Lombardis rankings, it is pretty clear that not only are those rankings kinda subjective (which is not that bad, they always have to be), but they way they are presented is kinda misleading, which is a huge part of the WTF, at least for me:
Frank Gore is a great example for this: Lombardi puts a definition of blue- and red-chip players on the rankings, and if you look at that, he pretty clearly ranked Frank wrong:
Let´s see and compare that to Gore: creating mismatches vs. most opponents? Check. One of the team´s featured players? Check. Direct impact on the outcome of the game? Well, Check again. Forget the top ten thing (we can argue about the exact top ten rankings of RBs until the end of time), but does that not sound exactly like the definition for Frank Gore on the Niners as he has been the last couple years?
Oh, btw Gore is not the only guy slighted that way. If you look at that blue-chip definition, how is Calvin Johnson not a blue-chip player in Lombardis mind?
If you write up an exact definition of what makes a blue-chip and a red-chip for you, be consistent in applying this definition to your rankings, otherwise it is nothing more than a stupid "players I like" list!!
But the fun doesn´t stop there. The way those rankings are presented, you might think, those include the body of work those players did during their careers, so it would be kind of a list of impact players on each team. At least I would think most fans would look at the list this way, I certainly did at the beginning.
But look at for example the Seahawks, who have only one "chip" player, Brandon Mebane? Yeah, the Seahawks have been bad, but you would think Lofa Tatupu would at least get consideration as a red chip? Well, the thing is, he was hurt most of last year, so Lombardi took him off his list. This means, his player rankings are based on last season only! This would be okay as an evaluation as well, but if you only rank players according to last year, say so from the very beginning, do not imply otherwise!
Uh, where was I? Uh, sorry, rant over
Well, at least one funny thing from the rankings remains: If you believe that success in the NFL starts with the trenches, Lombardi kinda likes our defense: There are exactly two teams in the entire NFL who have a starting defensive line comprised solely of red- and blue-chip players. One are the Vikings and the other are, surprisingly, the Niners…
Frank Gore is a great example for this: Lombardi puts a definition of blue- and red-chip players on the rankings, and if you look at that, he pretty clearly ranked Frank wrong:
Quote:
…He is good enough to create mismatches vs. most opponents. He must also be one of the team's featured players and have a direct impact on the outcome of the game.
Let´s see and compare that to Gore: creating mismatches vs. most opponents? Check. One of the team´s featured players? Check. Direct impact on the outcome of the game? Well, Check again. Forget the top ten thing (we can argue about the exact top ten rankings of RBs until the end of time), but does that not sound exactly like the definition for Frank Gore on the Niners as he has been the last couple years?
Oh, btw Gore is not the only guy slighted that way. If you look at that blue-chip definition, how is Calvin Johnson not a blue-chip player in Lombardis mind?
If you write up an exact definition of what makes a blue-chip and a red-chip for you, be consistent in applying this definition to your rankings, otherwise it is nothing more than a stupid "players I like" list!!
But the fun doesn´t stop there. The way those rankings are presented, you might think, those include the body of work those players did during their careers, so it would be kind of a list of impact players on each team. At least I would think most fans would look at the list this way, I certainly did at the beginning.
But look at for example the Seahawks, who have only one "chip" player, Brandon Mebane? Yeah, the Seahawks have been bad, but you would think Lofa Tatupu would at least get consideration as a red chip? Well, the thing is, he was hurt most of last year, so Lombardi took him off his list. This means, his player rankings are based on last season only! This would be okay as an evaluation as well, but if you only rank players according to last year, say so from the very beginning, do not imply otherwise!
Uh, where was I? Uh, sorry, rant over
Well, at least one funny thing from the rankings remains: If you believe that success in the NFL starts with the trenches, Lombardi kinda likes our defense: There are exactly two teams in the entire NFL who have a starting defensive line comprised solely of red- and blue-chip players. One are the Vikings and the other are, surprisingly, the Niners…
Jul 23, 2010 at 8:34 AM
- jones49
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,562
Basically he's saying Gore and Lawson are on the same level? Get the f**k out of here.