Originally posted by NCommand:Originally posted by NinerGM:Quote:
It's worth mentioning a large proportion of the 49ers' pressure was unblocked (rushers and blitzers just coming free), probably due to the constant movement on the line. Nearly 26 percent of the sacks, hits and hurries were unassigned, the largest percentage in the league.
So sounds like someone was calling the wrong protections at the LOS and the scheme wasn't designed well to pick-up blitzing.
This sounds eerily familiar to something I posted at the beginning of last year:
Quote:
Finally, it's worth noting that the Baltimore Ravens changed offensive line coaches. Gone is Chris Foerster, who served as the team's offensive line coach since 2005. The Ravens line was miserable in '05, better in '06, and not very good in '07. In 2004, his last year in Miami, his line surrendered the second most sacks in the league (52) and tied for last in yards per rush (3.5). Foerster was hired by San Francisco this year, and I suppose it should surprise no one that the 49ers are 25th in rushing yards, and 3rd worst in sacks allowed (45).
http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2008/12/11/689453/a-closer-look-at-the-balti
This, in my mind, is an example of an offensive scheme being very predictable and easy to adjust to from a defensive perspective. So, Frank Gore is NEVER allowed to break it outside. VD was the only home run threat. Therefore, stack the LOS with 8 to 9 men in the box and run blitz meaning at least 1 or 2 guys came scott-free while Smith was back peddling and/or scrambling for his life. Naturally, he did better when in a shot gun and had that extra second to find a receiver after surveying the field.
So philosophy - scheme - coaching - talent
Let's hope it is much better this season.