Originally posted by sixbricks:
Pete will FAIL like he did during his HC NFL days. I'm more concern about Warner playing another year instead of retiring
Problem is he didn't fail. He went to the playoffs in 99.
There are 356 users in the forums
Originally posted by sixbricks:
Pete will FAIL like he did during his HC NFL days. I'm more concern about Warner playing another year instead of retiring
Originally posted by Joecool:Originally posted by nvninerfan1:Originally posted by Joecool:
Technically, Walsh can go under Al Davis. Davis was one of the pioneers of passing to the RB/FB.
Technically, Davis could go under Sid Gilman the father of the deep passing game.
But Davis was the pioneers of using the RB/FB in the passing game.
Originally posted by ninerdaddy:
what ifs, QB scenarios...
what if PC tries to pick Leinart from the Tards. what if Warner retires. what if Hasselbeck ends up with the Tards. and worse, what if Hasselbeck ends up with us, and Alex gets shipped off to AZ.
Originally posted by 49wyztoscore:Originally posted by sixbricks:
Pete will FAIL like he did during his HC NFL days. I'm more concern about Warner playing another year instead of retiring
Problem is he didn't fail. He went to the playoffs in 99.
Originally posted by sixbricks:
Pete will FAIL like he did during his HC NFL days. I'm more concern about Warner playing another year instead of retiring
Originally posted by TX9R:
Well I'll say this, he's already putting a pretty good staff, Bates as OC who learned under Shanahan, now Alex Gibbs the zone blocking guru to coach the line. He apparently learned one thing a USC, hire smart innovative teachers to work for you. Basically the opposite of what we've done.
Originally posted by TX9R:
Well I'll say this, he's already putting a pretty good staff, Bates as OC who learned under Shanahan, now Alex Gibbs the zone blocking guru to coach the line. He apparently learned one thing a USC, hire smart innovative teachers to work for you. Basically the opposite of what we've done.
Quote:
The pattern is clear. People at nearly every level of Seahawks management will tell you whatever suits them at the time. The team's efforts to cast itself as a model franchise appear fraudulent.
This organization has very little credibility.
The word "dysfunction" seems inadequate.
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:Originally posted by TX9R:
Well I'll say this, he's already putting a pretty good staff, Bates as OC who learned under Shanahan, now Alex Gibbs the zone blocking guru to coach the line. He apparently learned one thing a USC, hire smart innovative teachers to work for you. Basically the opposite of what we've done.
Agreed. Bates & Gibbs will make a good team. I already have staff envy.
Originally posted by ApatheticIAm:
Do you think Sing and his coaching staff can keep up with Whisenhunt and Carroll? I think Carroll can turn the Seahawks around, I just don't know how quickly. Whis already has the Cardinals in the playoffs. Say what you want, but whisenhunt is a good coach. I actually believe Spagnola can bring the Rams back eventually.
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
Mike Sando rips the Seahawks . . .
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/12855/seahawks-facing-credibility-crisis
Quote:
The pattern is clear. People at nearly every level of Seahawks management will tell you whatever suits them at the time. The team's efforts to cast itself as a model franchise appear fraudulent.
This organization has very little credibility.
The word "dysfunction" seems inadequate.
Ouch . . . this from a former Seahawk beat writer . . .