LISTEN: Final 49ers 7-Round Mock Draft With Steph Sanchez →

There are 273 users in the forums

How should the 49ers handle the future QB situation?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

How should the 49ers handle the future QB situation?

Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
They should shoot themselves in the head if they even contemplate drafting another QB.

And that's not cause Alex is the "savior" of the franchise either. That's cause we JUST drafted one and have both Smith an Hill on the DC. So if Alex ain't the future ride his arm til Davis gets some more time with the 2nd team and then adjust accordingly.

If Alex IS the future reverse roles 2 and 3 and adjust accordingly.

If we pick up another QB for ANYTHING other than Camp Fodder I'm going to be really really REALLY miffed.

~Ceadder

Sorry Ceadder, I got call BS

You are one of Alex's loudest and most ardent fans, and therefore not eligible to make a dispassionate decision regarding the QB position. I love your loyalty and your passion but in reality stockpiling talent is never a bad thing.

In this years draft we can see a great example, we had Bruce Morgan Hill and had spent good money on a free agent receiver with starting credentials. Using your reasoning we should have passed on Crabtree.

If when we select in the first round with one of our two picks there is a blue chip QB prospect on the board we would be fools not to take him. If Alex continues to improve, Davis show flashes and our new first rounder looks great, Davis will have trade value above the pick we spent on him. Alex will be battling it out with this years pick for a season or two, and one of them will be traded for picks, and we will have the made our selves better at the most important single position on the field.

Hill is done and should be cut. Next year Smith starts Davis backs up and this years first rounder rides the pine. This would be a situation almost as good as Montana, Young and Bono!

With 50 million or so in cap space projected next season and two first round picks, the rebuilding can end and the stockpiling depth can begin! I think if we pick best available on the board all the way throughout the draft, we can add a pass rusher and and a guard with through free agency with out spending all of our cap room.

If drafting best available brings us a QB, or a RB, hell even a monster inside linebacker who cares we just get better and deeper!

You're certainly entitled to your opinion GL, but I'm not doing anything regarding Smith that I haven't done for any other player that still wears the uniform. If ya attack mines, I gonna step in and make ya scrap it out. The doubters may be right. Hell I might be right in what I saw in them all along given that it's been quite a few that I defended. Battle? Kwame? Rossum? Roman? The list is long it's not just Alex that I've defended bro. My record on this topic reflects that.

Alex just takes more of the crap tenfold at the moment. So of course it looks like he's always been my personal hero from the time he was drafted. But even then looks are deceiving. Cause I wasn't even wanting a QB with the 1st overall. Part of that had to do with the logistical evidence that it was a stupid move given the amount of money it would TAKE to sign one. Remember now QBs' had been taken in successive drafts so therefore the position was only getting more expensive to sign. That's neither the team or the position's fault. That was simple economic fact. As a result I wanted Edwards given that we were trying to get ourselves out of Cap hell at the time. Didn't need to go right back the next season.

But anyway I digress. We got Alex and I gave him the BoD and he showed ME, maybe not you or others but ME, that he indeed had the tools. Hell I didn't even want him to Start for a couple years. Like most people here I subscribe to the sit em and let em grow mentality. Davis is doing that now.

So why even muck with the position again when we don't HAVE to. Injury? Fine. Draft one. Bust? What's the final year of his contract going to cost us and then move on. But NOT Bust(intriguing), and now ya just created another hurdle for the man that has taken it all in stride w/o throwing anyone under the Bus. Nothing wrong with hurdles at all. But too many other issues of need are more important than plucking someone off the first day sheet at QB.

If you don't know them by now, well you just don't know.
I stand by my opinion on the matter. It would be career suicide to draft a QB. Sign one of the many castoffs and play the hand ya dealt yourself. I think Sims will be available. Griese is available. There are plenty of available backups to bring to Camp.

~Ceadder

Well worded post my man, but you don't address my key point.
I am liking Alex's play more and more he just might be a great Qb I love it!.

My point is this, We are an ascending team, we have a few holes, but none that can'y be addressed. I am a strong believer that you build depth in the draft, and fill needs through free agency. If you draft a player at a redundant position, so what he rides the or takes the starters job doesn't matter trade the less talented of the two for more picks!

This is a draft deep in QB talent if a blue chipper is staring you in the face on the first day, take him. I think Hill is done, Davis should be the #2 next year behind Smith, and if we got a Mcoy or a Bradford on the bench for a couple of years while he learns so be it. 3-4 years from now if we have Smith as a top ten QB, Davis pushing him because he shown signs of greatness, AND a another strong arm on the bench, how does this hurt us, it would be like having too much ice cream... aint no such thing as too much ice cream, somebody will alway help you eat it!
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Originally posted by haggard:
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Regardless of Alex Smith's fate, we have to get a QB in Ninerland for next year. What role that QB will play (starter, backup, mentor to Davis) remains to be seen. The absolute worst thing we could do is put all our eggs in Alex's basket (like we did with Hill last season) and pretend our QB deficiencies have been solved.

Drafting another QB would render developing Davis irrelevant, especially if we wasted a high draft choice on him. We have to get a vet via FA to fill the void. Not much to choose from next season. Most guys that are "serviceable" (Pennington, Jackson, etc) will be looking for permanent homes where they could be starters. Our only bet is to take a shot at Vick or bring back Garcia.

Cant think of any other option.

It's only a waste if we draft a bust. We drafted plenty of busts (or underperformers) along the O-Line. Does that mean we stop drafting linemen? If the Alex Smith pick made Ninerland so afraid to draft another 1st round QB then why are we counting on him to be our future QB?

This is a strong QB draft, we have two first round picks, QB is the most important position in the game, and still plenty of questions at the position. If a top rated signal caller is on the draft board when it's our pick, we pass on him, and Alex doesn't pan out, we're going to regret it.

I could care less about Smith; Im more concerned with Davis and his development. I dont think the Niners would go into 2010 with 4 QBs; assuming that Hill leaves, drafting a QB leaves Alex out to hang with no viable replacement. And since we know that Alex has a tendency to fail at times, i wouldnt want to be in a situation where we have to put in the draftee or Davis. Thats why i think we should get a QB via FA, just to serve as a backup or even a mentor to Davis.

If Alex fails to live up to expectations we will likely need to draft another QB in 2011. If we're in the spot to lock one down now we need to pull the trigger. If Alex proves a lot of people wrong, like someone said, too much ice cream is never bad.

People seem to have a lot of faith in a bottom of the 5th round draft pick that appears to have small hands, likes wearing gloves on both hands, does not use the laces on the ball, may or may not be able to handle an NFL playbook, is shorter than ideal, played poorly in MAC title game and GMAC Bowl and had major ball control issues, fumbling eight times in those final two outings. Sure he has upside, that's why we drafted him, but to pass on a 1st round talent QB because Nate Davis is waiting in the wings is a questionable decision at best. Davis' is a good project but just that, a project.

We have ample talent on offense (Crabs, Morgan, VD, DW, Gore, etc) and we're banking on a 5th year pro that has yet to throw a 300 yard game and can't run a pro style offence and a 5th round pick with a learning disability that needs major adjustments to his throwing mechanics to utilize that talent. Freaking brilliant move!

Crabs is going to pull a TO, and who could blame him, if the organization fails to get someone that can effectively get him the ball.
  • ZRF80
  • Member
  • Posts: 13,551
Originally posted by haggard:
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Originally posted by haggard:
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Regardless of Alex Smith's fate, we have to get a QB in Ninerland for next year. What role that QB will play (starter, backup, mentor to Davis) remains to be seen. The absolute worst thing we could do is put all our eggs in Alex's basket (like we did with Hill last season) and pretend our QB deficiencies have been solved.

Drafting another QB would render developing Davis irrelevant, especially if we wasted a high draft choice on him. We have to get a vet via FA to fill the void. Not much to choose from next season. Most guys that are "serviceable" (Pennington, Jackson, etc) will be looking for permanent homes where they could be starters. Our only bet is to take a shot at Vick or bring back Garcia.

Cant think of any other option.

It's only a waste if we draft a bust. We drafted plenty of busts (or underperformers) along the O-Line. Does that mean we stop drafting linemen? If the Alex Smith pick made Ninerland so afraid to draft another 1st round QB then why are we counting on him to be our future QB?

This is a strong QB draft, we have two first round picks, QB is the most important position in the game, and still plenty of questions at the position. If a top rated signal caller is on the draft board when it's our pick, we pass on him, and Alex doesn't pan out, we're going to regret it.

I could care less about Smith; Im more concerned with Davis and his development. I dont think the Niners would go into 2010 with 4 QBs; assuming that Hill leaves, drafting a QB leaves Alex out to hang with no viable replacement. And since we know that Alex has a tendency to fail at times, i wouldnt want to be in a situation where we have to put in the draftee or Davis. Thats why i think we should get a QB via FA, just to serve as a backup or even a mentor to Davis.

If Alex fails to live up to expectations we will likely need to draft another QB in 2011. If we're in the spot to lock one down now we need to pull the trigger. If Alex proves a lot of people wrong, like someone said, too much ice cream is never bad.

People seem to have a lot of faith in a bottom of the 5th round draft pick that appears to have small hands, likes wearing gloves on both hands, does not use the laces on the ball, may or may not be able to handle an NFL playbook, is shorter than ideal, played poorly in MAC title game and GMAC Bowl and had major ball control issues, fumbling eight times in those final two outings. Sure he has upside, that's why we drafted him, but to pass on a 1st round talent QB because Nate Davis is waiting in the wings is a questionable decision at best. Davis' is a good project but just that, a project.

We have ample talent on offense (Crabs, Morgan, VD, DW, Gore, etc) and we're banking on a 5th year pro that has yet to throw a 300 yard game and can't run a pro style offence and a 5th round pick with a learning disability that needs major adjustments to his throwing mechanics to utilize that talent. Freaking brilliant move!

Crabs is going to pull a TO, and who could blame him, if the organization fails to get someone that can effectively get him the ball.

You make some very good points. I would still bring in a vet this offseason.......
  • Chief
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 28,271
Get Steve Young out of retirement.
Originally posted by haggard:
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Originally posted by haggard:
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Regardless of Alex Smith's fate, we have to get a QB in Ninerland for next year. What role that QB will play (starter, backup, mentor to Davis) remains to be seen. The absolute worst thing we could do is put all our eggs in Alex's basket (like we did with Hill last season) and pretend our QB deficiencies have been solved.

Drafting another QB would render developing Davis irrelevant, especially if we wasted a high draft choice on him. We have to get a vet via FA to fill the void. Not much to choose from next season. Most guys that are "serviceable" (Pennington, Jackson, etc) will be looking for permanent homes where they could be starters. Our only bet is to take a shot at Vick or bring back Garcia.

Cant think of any other option.

It's only a waste if we draft a bust. We drafted plenty of busts (or underperformers) along the O-Line. Does that mean we stop drafting linemen? If the Alex Smith pick made Ninerland so afraid to draft another 1st round QB then why are we counting on him to be our future QB?

This is a strong QB draft, we have two first round picks, QB is the most important position in the game, and still plenty of questions at the position. If a top rated signal caller is on the draft board when it's our pick, we pass on him, and Alex doesn't pan out, we're going to regret it.

I could care less about Smith; Im more concerned with Davis and his development. I dont think the Niners would go into 2010 with 4 QBs; assuming that Hill leaves, drafting a QB leaves Alex out to hang with no viable replacement. And since we know that Alex has a tendency to fail at times, i wouldnt want to be in a situation where we have to put in the draftee or Davis. Thats why i think we should get a QB via FA, just to serve as a backup or even a mentor to Davis.

If Alex fails to live up to expectations we will likely need to draft another QB in 2011. If we're in the spot to lock one down now we need to pull the trigger. If Alex proves a lot of people wrong, like someone said, too much ice cream is never bad.

People seem to have a lot of faith in a bottom of the 5th round draft pick that appears to have small hands, likes wearing gloves on both hands, does not use the laces on the ball, may or may not be able to handle an NFL playbook, is shorter than ideal, played poorly in MAC title game and GMAC Bowl and had major ball control issues, fumbling eight times in those final two outings. Sure he has upside, that's why we drafted him, but to pass on a 1st round talent QB because Nate Davis is waiting in the wings is a questionable decision at best. Davis' is a good project but just that, a project.

We have ample talent on offense (Crabs, Morgan, VD, DW, Gore, etc) and we're banking on a 5th year pro that has yet to throw a 300 yard game and can't run a pro style offence and a 5th round pick with a learning disability that needs major adjustments to his throwing mechanics to utilize that talent. Freaking brilliant move!

Crabs is going to pull a TO, and who could blame him, if the organization fails to get someone that can effectively get him the ball.


That's an eye opening post right there. Although I disagree about the TO thing. I don't think a TO type attitude could survive on a Singletary-run football team.

[ Edited by AXEGRINDER on Dec 5, 2009 at 21:28:41 ]
The 49ers don't need to worry about another QB, they need to build an offensive line, and then any mediocre QB will look productive in time (like Tom Brady).
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by haggard:
Easy, stock up on the most important position in the game. Even if Alex finishes strong they should draft another QB just for insurance. San Diego drafted Rivers when they were unsure about Breese. 49ers have two #1 picks. They have to draft a QB if he's top of the draft board when it's their turn.

Stop reading my mind... grumble grumble I need more tin foil in my hat!

You sir are 100000% correct! we should have done this two years ago!

Yes+
So was it a bad idea to have Joe Montana and Steve Young as 49ers QBs at the same time? I rest my case.

If a potentially very good QB is there we should take him, it's a good year for QB's.

If Smith doesn't pan out we have Davis and another ready to try..
Originally posted by Super5:
Several people on the zone say draft ANOTHER QB but without a serious upgrade on the o-line it WILL NOT MATTER who you put behind center.So far Alex is having his best season as a starter and if he continues to improve and stay consistent along with N.Davis backing him up next year,the QB position should be a non issue.

Draft/FA:

OL (absolute must)

Pass Rusher

Safety

CB

NT
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 59,932
Originally posted by Bali-Niner:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by haggard:
Easy, stock up on the most important position in the game. Even if Alex finishes strong they should draft another QB just for insurance. San Diego drafted Rivers when they were unsure about Breese. 49ers have two #1 picks. They have to draft a QB if he's top of the draft board when it's their turn.

Stop reading my mind... grumble grumble I need more tin foil in my hat!

You sir are 100000% correct! we should have done this two years ago!

Yes+

Easily the best answer!!! I agree with all three of you.

it would be the worst thing the niners could do is waste a draft pick on a QB as numerous people have said already there is more glaring needs than a QB. what do we do with this QB that we draft are we going to start him straight away and screw him up like we did with alex in 05.if we are going to set him and let him learn the offence aren't we doing that already with nate. the draft is crap for QB free agent is crap and there is no team in there right mind that is going to trade there #1 QB.
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 64,320
I'm with Aussie, there's nothing out there in the FA market or the draft that's a better alternative. Stick with Alex and revisit the situation next year when there should be a better crop of Qb's available.
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
This will be easier to answer in about 30 days . . . hopefully.

Hopefully we gotta wait til Feb to find out
  • Lifer
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,175
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Bali-Niner:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by haggard:
Easy, stock up on the most important position in the game. Even if Alex finishes strong they should draft another QB just for insurance. San Diego drafted Rivers when they were unsure about Breese. 49ers have two #1 picks. They have to draft a QB if he's top of the draft board when it's their turn.

Stop reading my mind... grumble grumble I need more tin foil in my hat!

You sir are 100000% correct! we should have done this two years ago!

Yes+

Easily the best answer!!! I agree with all three of you.

I don't know why you're citing San Diego as an example. The Chargers made the wrong call at QB and gave up on Brees too soon. Not since Tampa Bay traded Steve Young has a team allowed such a talented quarterback to get away. Rivers is a fine QB, but Brees is the best in the game right now. If SD had continued with Brees and used their high draft pick elsewhere, they'd be a stronger team than they are now... and the Saints would be cruising somewhere below the radar instead of headed for the Super Bowl. San Diego makes the case for staying the course at QB and not giving up on a guy until you really, really know that he's reached his full potential.

In all likelihood, Alex Smith will show enough the rest of the way to come back as the starter next year. We won't actually know what he's capable of until we've seen him in the same system two years in a row, with good blocking (hopefully) and play makers around him. If it looks like Nate Davis a capable of being the #2 next year (a big if) then I think you can afford the luxury of drafting a QB prospect in the middle rounds. But I'd use the first round picks on an Offensive Tackle and a pass rusher.
Originally posted by Lifer:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Bali-Niner:
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
Originally posted by haggard:
Easy, stock up on the most important position in the game. Even if Alex finishes strong they should draft another QB just for insurance. San Diego drafted Rivers when they were unsure about Breese. 49ers have two #1 picks. They have to draft a QB if he's top of the draft board when it's their turn.

Stop reading my mind... grumble grumble I need more tin foil in my hat!

You sir are 100000% correct! we should have done this two years ago!

Yes+

Easily the best answer!!! I agree with all three of you.

I don't know why you're citing San Diego as an example. The Chargers made the wrong call at QB and gave up on Brees too soon. Not since Tampa Bay traded Steve Young has a team allowed such a talented quarterback to get away. Rivers is a fine QB, but Brees is the best in the game right now. If SD had continued with Brees and used their high draft pick elsewhere, they'd be a stronger team than they are now... and the Saints would be cruising somewhere below the radar instead of headed for the Super Bowl. San Diego makes the case for staying the course at QB and not giving up on a guy until you really, really know that he's reached his full potential.

In all likelihood, Alex Smith will show enough the rest of the way to come back as the starter next year. We won't actually know what he's capable of until we've seen him in the same system two years in a row, with good blocking (hopefully) and play makers around him. If it looks like Nate Davis a capable of being the #2 next year (a big if) then I think you can afford the luxury of drafting a QB prospect in the middle rounds. But I'd use the first round picks on an Offensive Tackle and a pass rusher.

Sounds reasonable. I think the Nate Davis fan club will grow. The most popular position on any NFL club is the backup QB. I remember the Jim Kelly days for Buffalo when fans would call for Frank Reich to start after an INT.
Share 49ersWebzone