Tarell Brown will start against Indy | Page 2

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:53 AM

ninersrule4
Veteran
Posts: 19,584

Originally posted by Dajanksta:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
I'm sure is a strategic move, Indy uses a lot of 3WR sets, and I'm willing to bet that Nate is going to see a LOT of Dallas Clark. But still, get ready for overreaction central and at least one or two "Nate is done." threads...

Majority of Niners fans are whiney

lol we're whining about whiney threads! haha we is funny

Lol

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:54 AM

#17

HessianDud
Veteran
Posts: 22,995

WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:55 AM

#18

ninersrule4
Veteran
Posts: 19,584

Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:57 AM

#19

Dajanksta
CrankyJanke
Posts: 67,773

Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

what if tbrown locks fools down and takes 5 peyton manning passes back for six? lol

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:57 AM

#20

PatrickJira411
Member
Posts: 4,117

Weird, Clements has played really well year all but one game and I think he matches up well vs Reggie Wayne. If anything I think Dre Bly should see the field more when the Colts go 3 wide....

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:58 AM

#21

dhp318
Veteran
Posts: 4,859

I'm sure Nate will be covering Dallas Clark, which is a pretty tough task for anyone... Also, I'm sure the other wideout opposite Wayne will be a smaller quick guy like Garcon, which might be a better matchup for Brown.

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:58 AM

#22

chimp914
Veteran
Posts: 1,520

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:58 AM

#23

Dajanksta
CrankyJanke
Posts: 67,773

Originally posted by PatrickJira411:
Weird, Clements has played really well year all but one game and I think he matches up well vs Reggie Wayne. If anything I think Dre Bly should see the field more when the Colts go 3 wide....

meh. Id rather have brown than bly. Bly is as fragile as my 98yr old grandmothers fingernails. and I'm still pissed at him for fumbling that ball.
But he has made some pretty good third down pass deflections.

Oct 31, 2009 at 8:58 AM

#24

HessianDud
Veteran
Posts: 22,995

Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

yeah, i could definitely see that, that its a more strategic move than a punishment for Nate. Also, playing the nickel maybe he'll be in better position to help against the run--kind of like another SS or LB?

I'm interested to see how this works and to see how Brown plays. The team has been high on him but I've never really noticed him.

Oct 31, 2009 at 9:00 AM

#25

ninersrule4
Veteran
Posts: 19,584

Originally posted by Dajanksta:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

what if tbrown locks fools down and takes 5 peyton manning passes back for six? lol

Lol not going to happen. Nate hasnt done anything to get benched he had like 2 bad plays. Prior to those two plays in the ATL game fans were all over his sack lol now there hatting on him hes played good since than Ninersfans=whiney lol

Oct 31, 2009 at 9:00 AM

#26

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

are you kidding imo i think he is playing the best on our D next to smith and willis he shut down andre smith completely (that long pass was of spencer) he also shut down fitzgerald the only thing is he missed 2 plays on white i dont think he is doing a bad job at all they must have seen sometghing on tape which we obviously have not seen which is why the move was made

Oct 31, 2009 at 9:00 AM

#27

Kolohe
Hall of Fame
Posts: 59,927

Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

I have to agree to this. Its not like Nate played bad last Sunday that he deserved this, he held Andre Johnson pretty much in check.

Oct 31, 2009 at 9:01 AM

#28

ninersrule4
Veteran
Posts: 19,584

Originally posted by HessianDud:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

yeah, i could definitely see that, that its a more strategic move than a punishment for Nate. Also, playing the nickel maybe he'll be in better position to help against the run--kind of like another SS or LB?

I'm interested to see how this works and to see how Brown plays. The team has been high on him but I've never really noticed him.

Haha dude Im glad im not alone on that one. Whats the big deal with a 5th rounder

Oct 31, 2009 at 9:02 AM

#29

Dajanksta
CrankyJanke
Posts: 67,773

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

I have to agree to this. Its not like Nate played bad last Sunday that he deserved this, he held Andre Johnson pretty much in check.

agreed.
It has to be just for this game im sure. Like someone else said if they try to run it now nate is that much closer to make a play on the run. he our our best tackler i think in the secondary. so spikes out against the run and clements is in against the run.

Oct 31, 2009 at 9:03 AM

#30

Super5
Veteran
Posts: 1,513

Originally posted by HessianDud:
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
WOW, that's even more shocking than Spencer winning the RCB job at the start of the year.

The article does say that Clements will play the nickel and we'll probably use that formation most during the game (especially with Spikes possibly out), so I imagine Nate will play most of the game--but he hasn't played well and something like this was probably needed.

I hope this move turns out to be as wise as starting spencer...

I guarantee it is just for this game due to the fact no one on this team can cover TEs except Nate. He will be on Clark ALL DAY. If Sing benches Nate he is an idiot plain and simple

yeah, i could definitely see that, that its a more strategic move than a punishment for Nate. Also, playing the nickel maybe he'll be in better position to help against the run--kind of like another SS or LB?

I'm interested to see how this works and to see how Brown plays. The team has been high on him but I've never really noticed him.

Last year in limited play he looked good(had a couple of picks), he sealed the last game in 08 with a int(Denver)