There are 96 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Its time for Ahmad Brooks to start

no
Originally posted by MadMartz:
What do we have to lose, it cant get much worse!

Thoughts?

no.

You have no idea what you're talking about.
Originally posted by bigmike55:
I say put him in at Middle Linebacker for Spikes if he's not ready. Brooks > Wilhelm

what the balls are you talking about sir
Rotate him in for Haralson on 1st and 2nd down and for Lawson on 3rd and long. Haralson looked like a better pass rusher then Lawson but Lawson is very good at forcing the run back to the middle of the field.
Originally posted by saj4423:
Rotate him in for Haralson on 1st and 2nd down and for Lawson on 3rd and long. Haralson looked like a better pass rusher then Lawson but Lawson is very good at forcing the run back to the middle of the field.

In other words - Start Brooks and rotate out Lawson & Haralson.

No thank you.
Originally posted by Overkill:
Originally posted by saj4423:
Rotate him in for Haralson on 1st and 2nd down and for Lawson on 3rd and long. Haralson looked like a better pass rusher then Lawson but Lawson is very good at forcing the run back to the middle of the field.

In other words - Start Brooks and rotate out Lawson & Haralson.

No thank you.

Did not say start Brooks. When he does play he should rotate in for Haralson on run downs and Lawson on 3rd and long.
Originally posted by saj4423:
Originally posted by Overkill:
Originally posted by saj4423:
Rotate him in for Haralson on 1st and 2nd down and for Lawson on 3rd and long. Haralson looked like a better pass rusher then Lawson but Lawson is very good at forcing the run back to the middle of the field.

In other words - Start Brooks and rotate out Lawson & Haralson.

No thank you.

Did not say start Brooks. When he does play he should rotate in for Haralson on run downs and Lawson on 3rd and long.

So basically (according to your OP), you want him in on every down except 3rd & short, but you don't want him to start. Got it.

BTW - Sing has stated he's not starting because he hasn't learned how to play the run yet. Doesn't sound like pulling Haralson for Brooks on running downs would be an improvement
Brooks is playing better, but he does not need to start
More playing time. That's about it for now.