There are 59 users in the forums
You've got to be kidding......
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM
#16
- Method
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,330
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM
#17
- blunt_probe
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,826
Yup, Spurlock was so worth keeping over Rossum. 
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM
#18
- SybErkRimInAL
- Veteran
- Posts: 59,180
this decision will not end well....
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM
#19
- SybErkRimInAL
- Veteran
- Posts: 59,180
Anyone know who makes these personnel decisions?? Cutting rossum over spurlock, letting coffee return kicks??
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM
#20
- valrod33
- Veteran
- Posts: 94,351
I miss rossum
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM
#21
- dust-7
- Info N/A
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Yup, Spurlock was so worth keeping over Rossum.
Rossum looked completely lost in the early season games he played.
Doesn't anyone remember, or all the things they posted during those games right here on this forum?
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM
#22
- TheG0RE49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,968
I love how some people are part of the coaching staff on this board 
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM
#23
- unst4bl3
- Member
- Posts: 7,568
I think its good, it will give coffee more time on the field, maybe it will help him open his eyes up and find holes, so when he is in the backfield he may get back to his old ways (from college)
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM
#24
- Method
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,330
Originally posted by dust-7:Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Yup, Spurlock was so worth keeping over Rossum.
Rossum looked completely lost in the early season games he played.
Doesn't anyone remember, or all the things they posted during those games right here on this forum?
Rossum is trash. I wanted to look for an upgrade all summer and I guess our coaches didn't feel like it. Horrible decision by them.
Oct 23, 2009 at 9:59 AM
#25
- unst4bl3
- Member
- Posts: 7,568
spurlock still needs to be cut.
Oct 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM
#26
- bigmur49
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,691
I'm kind of interested to see how it will go. Battle has not impressed, Spurlock can't catch the ball, and recently Walker hasn't done much for me to be excited.
Personally, without watching practices I would put Hill or Jones back there. As far as I know they are both speedsters, especially Hill, and it would be nice to see them on the field.
Personally, without watching practices I would put Hill or Jones back there. As far as I know they are both speedsters, especially Hill, and it would be nice to see them on the field.
Oct 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM
#27
- leakyfausett
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,972
Reggie Smith is hurt so he's out. I have no problem with the release of Rossum but I would stick with Walker or Battle. Walker was a kick returner in College. Spurlock is a waste of a roster space in my opinion. He and Bruce are just taking up space. Brandon Jones has returned punts but I don't know about kick offs. He has some decent speed too.
Oct 23, 2009 at 10:04 AM
#28
- dust-7
- Info N/A
Originally posted by bigmur49:
I would put Hill
If Jason Hill has the speed, then I wouldn't see why not.
Oct 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM
#29
- djfullshred
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,838
Have you guys been watching them in practice to see who is giving them their best chance at returns?
Me neither. Waiting for someone who has to set the record straight here.
Just saying.
Me neither. Waiting for someone who has to set the record straight here.
Just saying.
Oct 23, 2009 at 10:09 AM
#30
- blunt_probe
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,826
Originally posted by Method:If he was trash, then what does that make Battle and Walker?Originally posted by dust-7:Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Yup, Spurlock was so worth keeping over Rossum.
Rossum looked completely lost in the early season games he played.
Doesn't anyone remember, or all the things they posted during those games right here on this forum?
Rossum is trash. I wanted to look for an upgrade all summer and I guess our coaches didn't feel like it. Horrible decision by them.
The point is he was waaaaaay better than those two have ever been, and now we're stuck with Coffee back there.
