Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by 9ermj:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Mospeed:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Mospeed:
Can Shaun Hill bullet a ball to a receiver?
A lot of strong armed crap QB's that are out of this league can.
Well I'm just wondering because with Crabtrees catching ability I think it would be beneficial for our QB to be able to bullet a pass in so that the chances of it being intercepted are super low.
Yah, tell that to Brett Favre who also holds the league record for INT's.
That is because he would try and force things in his younger days. Hill still tries to force things into double and triple coverage with his duck passes.
And do they picked off??
According to you he can throw all the interceptions in the world as long as we are winning. Why change it? remember
True I said that, I don't deny it. I would rather be 14-2 with a QB who threw 20 picks, than go 2-14 with a QB who threw 20 TD's. Can't speak for everyone, its just my opinion.
If the QB threw 20 TD's then more than likely it is the defense that is the issue
Well can't really pin point and factor in on a imaginary team can you, in the end it would be your opinion and mine disagreeing with each other. But W's are W's and I would take them anyway then came, I could careless if they were pretty or not.
No but I can pinpoint a factor on a real team.
Good for you, but in the end, like I said, I'll take W's whether they are pretty or not, can't say the same for the rest of you.
yea but currently the W's are against weak teams. When we play real teams if the defense is struggling the offense does NOT have the ability to stay in or to win the game. But hey as long as the defense is winning the games lets not worry about a struggling offense
Down talk or disagree with my opinion as much as you like, but like I said, a W is a W.
And when those W's turn to L's as they surely will then what?, The Top Ramen Kid would have been ok if Sing's plan to run had worked or if the D was lights out every week, it's not working time to empty the trash, They are 3-2 and very likely going to be 3-4 in 2 weeks if Hill doesn't show something resembling an NFL Qb by then you could officially call him a 30 year old bust
Well in time wouldn't the O-line and running game have to improve along with Hill?? Or are you just stuck on Hill is never going to get better?? Like I said in past threads, if the O-line and running game is fully functional, and Hill is losing games for us, then make the switch. But until then, I'm happy the way the W's come.
Hill might not get any better, but the line had better or it won't matter who is playing QB, just like the past 6-7 years. I don't get why we can have a line good at run blocking that can't ever get the pass protection down. Now all these hypocrites that wanted to blame Smith for all the offenses struggles are finally beginning to see how important it is for the QB to have some protection, if it weren't costing us wins I would love rubbing their noses in it. Seriously though, we have to work on the lines in next years draft, screw drafting another unproven QB, either of the QB's we have now will be fine if they get some protection. If we can land Eric Berry, we should jump on him, but after that, or if he is already gone, we should spend every single pick on offensive line and pass rushers/ defensive line. Kiper and McShay say this upcoming draft is deep into the third round with quality in both of those areas.