We seriously need to change it up...
Bruce is dropping the ball and provides almsot no YAC. Jones is seeing very little action. Hill is also seeing very little action...
I am hoping we go with Morgan, Jones, and Hill on our 3 WR sets. I am not including Crabtree because I assume he will only see 5-6 plays the whole game. Thoughts?
Let's please not turn this into a QB thread...
There are 208 users in the forums
WRs against Houston?
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:11 PM
- SJniner7
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,749
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM
- matt49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,456
like the 5th post around this subject but why not. Start Morgan/B.Jones make Bruce #3 Crabtree #4 until he earns more PT
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM
- NinerForLife
- Veteran
- Posts: 476
Why are we apparently afraid to start new recievers? They don't know the playbook? Seems like NO ONE knows the playbook as it is. We run a digit based offense, not the WCO.
The Colts (I understand they have Peyton) are running a crapload of new recievers and I would bet their playbook is alot more complicated than Raye's.
The Colts (I understand they have Peyton) are running a crapload of new recievers and I would bet their playbook is alot more complicated than Raye's.
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM
- chimp914
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,520
Originally posted by NinerForLife:
Why are we apparently afraid to start new recievers? They don't know the playbook? Seems like NO ONE knows the playbook as it is. We run a digit based offense, not the WCO.
The Colts (I understand they have Peyton) are running a crapload of new recievers and I would bet their playbook is alot more complicated than Raye's.
and we have Shaun Hill.
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:21 PM
- Oakland-Niner
- Member
- Posts: 24,062
Now that I think about it Battle is probably a better option than Bruce. Battle is super sure handed. I cant remember the last time he dropped the ball. I dont think the NIners have treated fairly over the years. He would of been much better off with another team and probably a lot more successful.
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:28 PM
- saeniner
- Info N/A
Originally posted by chimp914:Originally posted by NinerForLife:
Why are we apparently afraid to start new recievers? They don't know the playbook? Seems like NO ONE knows the playbook as it is. We run a digit based offense, not the WCO.
The Colts (I understand they have Peyton) are running a crapload of new recievers and I would bet their playbook is alot more complicated than Raye's.
and we have Shaun Hill.
Exactly.
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:31 PM
- NinerForLife
- Veteran
- Posts: 476
Originally posted by chimp914:Originally posted by NinerForLife:
Why are we apparently afraid to start new recievers? They don't know the playbook? Seems like NO ONE knows the playbook as it is. We run a digit based offense, not the WCO.
The Colts (I understand they have Peyton) are running a crapload of new recievers and I would bet their playbook is alot more complicated than Raye's.
and we have Shaun Hill.
My point was are our recievers retarded because they can't figure out a digit based playbook or are the Colts recievers all members of Mensa? Something else has to be the reason other than not knowing the playbook.
Oct 11, 2009 at 9:39 PM
- NinersCluebat
- Info N/A
Originally posted by NinerForLife:Originally posted by chimp914:Originally posted by NinerForLife:
Why are we apparently afraid to start new recievers? They don't know the playbook? Seems like NO ONE knows the playbook as it is. We run a digit based offense, not the WCO.
The Colts (I understand they have Peyton) are running a crapload of new recievers and I would bet their playbook is alot more complicated than Raye's.
and we have Shaun Hill.
My point was are our recievers retarded because they can't figure out a digit based playbook or are the Colts recievers all members of Mensa? Something else has to be the reason other than not knowing the playbook.
Yeah, there is another reason...well, two: coaching and playcalling.