There are 357 users in the forums
start alex smith after the bye?
start alex smith after the bye?
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM
- DaveWilcox
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,717
Hill sucks monkey ....
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM
- BHulman
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,338
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:Originally posted by brhokla:
I'm sorry but I cannot compare Smith to Hill as Smith has the tools to be a QB in the NFL but Hill does not.
I know Smith has a stronger arm. I know he's younger and more athletic. But I'll take gutsy over arm strength any day. Didn't you read what Singletary said about Hill?
"I thought he was running for his life the whole game," Singletary said.
How are you going to complete a good pass that way. So bad that now Singletary is considering benching Rachal.
Smith isn't gutsy? I seem to remember him playing with a severly separated shoulder for a couple of games.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:21 PM
- B650
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,205
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
[ Edited by B650 on Oct 12, 2009 at 17:21:33 ]
[ Edited by B650 on Oct 12, 2009 at 17:21:33 ]
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM
- GhostofJimmyDean
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,893
Originally posted by B650:
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
Agreed. He's much better than Smith.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM
- B650
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,205
Originally posted by GhostofJimmyDean:Originally posted by B650:
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
Agreed. He's much better than Smith.
Much better than anyone we've had since 2002.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:25 PM
- Oakland-Niner
- Member
- Posts: 24,062
Isn't there already a thread like this?
Oh my bad, that one was "Alex Smith is bi-"
Oh my bad, that one was "Alex Smith is bi-"
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM
- GhostofJimmyDean
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,893
Originally posted by B650:Originally posted by GhostofJimmyDean:Originally posted by B650:
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
Agreed. He's much better than Smith.
Much better than anyone we've had since 2002.
Agreed again. So why are people trying to replace trash with sewer waste? We won't be able to do anything about the quarterback situation until the off-season anyway.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM
- 49ersalldaway126
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,549
Originally posted by B650:
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
there is a bog difference starting your rookie team with tons of talent and then starting a team with no talent what so ever does a lot to your confidence
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:29 PM
- B650
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,205
Originally posted by GhostofJimmyDean:Originally posted by B650:Originally posted by GhostofJimmyDean:Originally posted by B650:
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
Agreed. He's much better than Smith.
Much better than anyone we've had since 2002.
Agreed again. So why are people trying to replace trash with sewer waste? We won't be able to do anything about the quarterback situation until the off-season anyway.
Sewer waste has potential.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM
- GhostofJimmyDean
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,893
Originally posted by B650:Originally posted by GhostofJimmyDean:Originally posted by B650:Originally posted by GhostofJimmyDean:Originally posted by B650:
All I can say is watch Sanchez tonight. Now imagine him on our team. See a difference?
Agreed. He's much better than Smith.
Much better than anyone we've had since 2002.
Agreed again. So why are people trying to replace trash with sewer waste? We won't be able to do anything about the quarterback situation until the off-season anyway.
Sewer waste has potential.
The potential to stink.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM
- OnTheClock
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 36,377
Quoting from another thread.
Quote:
Again. Really like Smith, but I'd have to see Hill play this bad for a second consecutive game to want to make a change. You give the player a chance to rebound, yanking him so soon not only doesn't make sense, it is completely unfair. Even the best QBs have terrible games.
Giving Hill a chance to rebound over the next game or two is the same courtesy I'd give to Smith or ANY of our other QBs. Yes, he played awful, but seeing how he responds is what is important. You always want to give them at least a small chance to turn it around. If he doesn't? Then put in Smith.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:32 PM
- Oakland-Niner
- Member
- Posts: 24,062
reading this thread is like watching the tootie pop commercail when I was a kid!
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop?
One (in the voice of the old owl)
two
Cruch.....
The World may never know.
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop?
One (in the voice of the old owl)
two
Cruch.....
The World may never know.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:34 PM
- B650
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,205
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Quoting from another thread.
Quote:
Again. Really like Smith, but I'd have to see Hill play this bad for a second consecutive game to want to make a change. You give the player a chance to rebound, yanking him so soon not only doesn't make sense, it is completely unfair. Even the best QBs have terrible games.
Giving Hill a chance to rebound over the next game or two is the same courtesy I'd give to Smith or ANY of our other QBs. Yes, he played awful, but seeing how he responds is what is important. You always want to give them at least a small chance to turn it around. If he doesn't? Then put in Smith.
Except he's had 5 bad games now, in a row. I'll give him 8 and then he's out.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:36 PM
- OnTheClock
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 36,377
Originally posted by B650:Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Quoting from another thread.
Quote:
Again. Really like Smith, but I'd have to see Hill play this bad for a second consecutive game to want to make a change. You give the player a chance to rebound, yanking him so soon not only doesn't make sense, it is completely unfair. Even the best QBs have terrible games.
Giving Hill a chance to rebound over the next game or two is the same courtesy I'd give to Smith or ANY of our other QBs. Yes, he played awful, but seeing how he responds is what is important. You always want to give them at least a small chance to turn it around. If he doesn't? Then put in Smith.
Except he's had 5 bad games now, in a row. I'll give him 8 and then he's out.
I think he played average against the Rams, but poorly yesterday. If he plays "poorly" again, then I'd do something.
Oct 12, 2009 at 5:38 PM
- 49ersalldaway126
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,549
Originally posted by OnTheClock:Originally posted by B650:Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Quoting from another thread.
Quote:
Again. Really like Smith, but I'd have to see Hill play this bad for a second consecutive game to want to make a change. You give the player a chance to rebound, yanking him so soon not only doesn't make sense, it is completely unfair. Even the best QBs have terrible games.
Giving Hill a chance to rebound over the next game or two is the same courtesy I'd give to Smith or ANY of our other QBs. Yes, he played awful, but seeing how he responds is what is important. You always want to give them at least a small chance to turn it around. If he doesn't? Then put in Smith.
Except he's had 5 bad games now, in a row. I'll give him 8 and then he's out.
I think he played average against the Rams, but poorly yesterday. If he plays "poorly" again, then I'd do something.
no way he did good against he rams theyre D sucks and there is something wrong when your D scorees as much as your O