Originally posted by TowelBoy:
Originally posted by fanoe:
I seriously can't believe people still think Alex Smith is the answer... crazy-talk
Well, think about it. Hill has been very solid, but not spectacular. If Smith is able to get his ball-security and poise to near Hill's level as he matures, he'd start looking like a very good NFL quarterback.
Forget it man, there isn't a precedent for a QB who played for one team, that absolutely sucked for a few years before becoming a solid Player. One who retired with the same team that he started with...
...OH SNAP!!! Yeah there is, His name is Terry freakin Bradshaw. Though he DID play before the crystal ball QB Rating stat was devised. So no telling what would have happened had he had his rating determined over that span of suckiness. I imagine if our fans were running the Steelers at that time Bradshaw wouldn't be a four time Super Bowl Champion or a Hall of Famer.
It's a damn good thing that they don't run OUR team. Not that I'm equating Smith to anything other than the suckiness.
But one never knows until one addresses the OTHER contributing issues.
So far 3 out of 5 have been addressed.
Hell he may never amount to anything but those units still need to be addressed.
~Ceadder