Originally posted by D_Niner:Originally posted by NCommand:Originally posted by D_Niner:
The stats these guys are using don't tell the whole story. I don't have the time (or desire) to run through their calculations to pinpoint where the problem is; however, it dosent take a statistision to tell anyone that Frank Gore was a better RB than Deshaun Foster or M-Rob last year. But look at what their stats say.
According to this site in 2008....
D. Foster was a better RB than Frank Gore; but, M-Rob and Shaun Ryan blow them both out of the water...
Allen Rossum and Zeigler were our best WRs. Bruce, Morgan, and Johnson were the worst WRs on our team.
Nate Clemens was one of our worst DBs.
I got that Shaun Hill is our best player! +15 baby! LOL
LOL... If you like that one, look at where Frank is rated amongst other 2008 RBs. (#121 out of 131)
Wow!
Here's sSome interesting rankings on our D through the first two games that should make you feel better about their ranking system (e.g. Gore ranked #121):
Smith - best 3-4 DE
Franklin - 10th best over all DT/NT and 5th best NT
Sopoaga - 32nd (should go up after MN)
Haralson - 2nd best OLB
Lawson - only 7 OLB's are worse (and most are injured)
Willis - 15th best ILB (should go down a lot after MN and the very poor pass coverage)
Clements - 3rd best
Spencer - 6th best
Lewis - 54th
Goldson - 100th
Roman - 18th
Bly - 32nd
Evans - 16th
Balmer - 21st
McDonald - 27th
[ Edited by NCommand on Oct 1, 2009 at 12:47 PM ]