We Won...but how would you grade O-Line?

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:12 AM

BigMar
Member
Posts: 1,004

Well, we beat the Cards (with some help of all those Cards penalties)

So on a scale of 1 to 5... with 5 being the best, how would you grade our starting O-Line personal in that game?

*Staley
*Baas
*Heitmann
*Rachal
*Synder

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:14 AM

rxrunner
Veteran
Posts: 2,363

-1

[ Edited by rxrunner on Sep 14, 2009 at 11:15:31 ]

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:14 AM

Dino
Veteran
Posts: 22,423

Originally posted by BigMar:
So on a scale of 1 to 5... with 5 being the best, how would you grade our starting O-Line personal in that game?

1.5

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:14 AM

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Not nearly as relentless as your topic creations.

Amp is in destroyer mode today.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

3.16

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Defuego
Veteran
Posts: 2,854

In my mind it was BAAS, RACHEL, and SNYDER that didn't play well. The other two were fine. The guards were making mental mistakes which is just not acceptable.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:18 AM

BigMar
Member
Posts: 1,004

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Not nearly as relentless as your topic creations.

Geeez, you simply cannot respond to the thread topic, can you?

Your a swell guy.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:18 AM

NeeJ49er
Veteran
Posts: 9,580

1

The running game will be more effective once the playcalling isnt so predictable, but conservative playcalling won us a game so I wont rant

...but we need to develop an explosive passing game sooner or later to keep them from stacking the box ..

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM

#10

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by Defuego:
In my mind it was BAAS, RACHEL, and SNYDER that didn't play well. The other two were fine. The guards were making mental mistakes which is just not acceptable.

Snyder is just starting material. He is a career backup and will be replaced by Pashos, hopefully that dude is better.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM

#11

BigMar
Member
Posts: 1,004

Originally posted by Defuego:
In my mind it was BAAS, RACHEL, and SNYDER that didn't play well. The other two were fine. The guards were making mental mistakes which is just not acceptable.

Well, Baas and Synder had a very small excuse since they both were just returning from injuries.

Rachel was a bit inconsistant, a beast on one snap and quite average on another.

The Line should be ready to play much better at home at Hawks... I hope!

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 AM

#12

BigMar
Member
Posts: 1,004

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Not nearly as relentless as your topic creations.

Geeez, you simply cannot respond to the thread topic, can you?

Your a swell guy.

Considering there are numerous other topics on the subject, why should I give yours credence?

So why not just stay off this thread if it bothers you so much versus your snide remarks?

If you can't keep your comments to the thread subject.... stay away.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM

#13

4DNinersSon
Veteran
Posts: 475

I'd give them a 2.5 - 3. Tough to run against 8 & 9 man fronts. Snyder got badly exposed. He looked pathetic IMO.

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:27 AM

#14

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Originally posted by BigMar:
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Not nearly as relentless as your topic creations.

Geeez, you simply cannot respond to the thread topic, can you?

Your a swell guy.

Considering there are numerous other topics on the subject, why should I give yours credence?

Sep 14, 2009 at 11:28 AM

#15

Chico
Veteran
Posts: 2,546

Originally posted by AmpLee:
Not nearly as relentless as your topic creations.

LMAO! Sometimes i log on just to read the sarcastic remarks... this is some funny a$$ $h*t!!! LOL