There are 121 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

I say we try nate davis with first team offense

I say we try nate davis with first team offense

I'm watching the game and I like his pocket presence ,arm , and decision making. what do we have to lose
Ummmmmm no.... I just say we trust Sing.
Not this year. He would look way different going against starting caliber players. He was working with a damn good TE (Walker) and a good running game. He did look good and hopefully he develops into a successful starting QB for us.
  • indianajim
  • Info N/A
NOT A CHANCE.

[ Edited by indianajim on Aug 23, 2009 at 9:12 PM ]
Its preseason what do we have to lose
I knew this was coming as soon as he played well against the 3rd stringers... This guy is a project with some skills but he is not the answer yet....
He's not ready and wont be ready for another year or two so stop making threads like this and this goes out to everyone. It's just ONE pre season game against scrubs.
Originally posted by eddy99_1999:
Its preseason what do we have to lose

Lets see. Critical evaluation of our current QB competition.
That was the biggest mistake we made with Smith, why repeat it.

Let Davis be the 3rd string QB and learn the game at his pace.
ok first of all the raiders 1st team D sux and davis just torched the raiders 3rd team which are probally a bunch of UNFA or training camp chumps who are gonna get cut im not saying nate didnt do a good job but people need to stop overreacting
The Patriots developed Tom Brady for a year, I say we can do the same with Nate Davis.
No because he would get exposed and his confidence would be shot
Nate Davis, the new Thomas Clayton.

-9fA
Originally posted by linkboy:
That was the biggest mistake we made with Smith, why repeat it.

Let Davis be the 3rd string QB and learn the game at his pace.

This