There are 103 users in the forums
Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
man we can have a better running attack than the Giants!
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
no way in hell. Bring Jacobs to the bay and then we'll talk.
Originally posted by 9erred:
The Giants had three good runners that wore down defenses, potentially the Niners can impose their will on the defenses by wearing them down with three RB's.
Picture a double tight end set with Alex Boone of Bear Pascoe as the other blocking TE opposite VD. You have Gore, Coffee pounding the ball for the first half of the game. When the D is tired, you put in Sheets, and kaboom, long run, after long run.
When the D stacks the box, VD, Pascoe, Bruce, Morgan etc. can make them pay, pay pay.
I want to see time of possession in the Niners favor all season, and wins with a double digit margin of victory over the oppenents.
Is this realistic, I say YES!!!
Robinson is a terrible RB who happens to excel at special teams, which is the only reason hes still on the roster. but everyone was calling him the next elite goalline back...Originally posted by 3rdGenNiner:
I'll side with SD's running attack a few seasons ago as the standard
-LT (Gore)
-Turner (Coffee)
-Sproles (Sheets)
It;s funny their respective skill sets match more evenly than the Giants from last year
Originally posted by 3rdGenNiner:
I'll side with SD's running attack a few seasons ago as the standard
-LT (Gore)
-Turner (Coffee)
-Sproles (Sheets)
It;s funny their respective skill sets match more evenly than the Giants from last year
Originally posted by TheG0RE49er:
Originally posted by tjd808185:Originally posted by 3rdGenNiner:
I'll side with SD's running attack a few seasons ago as the standard
-LT (Gore)
-Turner (Coffee)
-Sproles (Sheets)
It;s funny their respective skill sets match more evenly than the Giants from last year
While this is a more accurate comparision than the Giants it's still a terrible comparision.
...good luck kid