Skip ahead to the 14:30 mark unless you want to hear more about the Favre saga.
And yeah - Williamson's only argument for McFadden over Willis was essentially that one plays RB (a "skill position") and one does not. Nevermind pro bowls, etc. RB always trumps LB, apparently.
Sando had a good line about how SF went 7-9 last year and that is the equivalent of a decade's worth of wins for Oakland. I had to laugh at that one.
There are 217 users in the forums
ESPN Football Today compares the Niners and Raiders
- 1 2
Aug 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM
- Overkill
- Moderator
- Posts: 10,800
Aug 19, 2009 at 10:51 AM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 30,031
Originally posted by Overkill:
Skip ahead to the 14:30 mark unless you want to hear more about the Favre saga.
And yeah - Williamson's only argument for McFadden over Willis was essentially that one plays RB (a "skill position") and one does not. Nevermind pro bowls, etc. RB always trumps LB, apparently.
Sando had a good line about how SF went 7-9 last year and that is the equivalent of a decade's worth of wins for Oakland. I had to laugh at that one.
Thanks homie for giving a time
Aug 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM
- 9erluv415
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,341
As biased as I know this things gets, the Espn Blogger for the AFC west is a ret@rd (even sounds like one). At least Sando gave good explanation and facts for his answers.
[ Edited by 9erluv415 on Aug 19, 2009 at 11:11 AM ]
Aug 19, 2009 at 11:25 AM
- Young2Rice
- Veteran
- Posts: 70,005
Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
Total homers to the division they're covering.
The AFC guy says that McFadden has more star power than Willis, and that it would be a stretch to call Willis a future HOF'er.
This guy has never seen this video.
Aug 19, 2009 at 11:38 AM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,604
Wow that is crazy. Has that guy watched any of the 49ers?
Aug 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM
- Psinex
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,537
Originally posted by Young2Rice:Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
Total homers to the division they're covering.
The AFC guy says that McFadden has more star power than Willis, and that it would be a stretch to call Willis a future HOF'er.
This guy has never seen this video.
I love how the commentators are stunned that Willis caught McFadden. McFadden must have had a lot of really big games. I also love that Willis is wearing number 49.
Aug 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM
- DJD
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,806
Originally posted by Overkill:
Skip ahead to the 14:30 mark unless you want to hear more about the Favre saga.
Critical info!!!
Aug 19, 2009 at 12:34 PM
- Tru2RedNGold25
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,972
Originally posted by aacadena:
Who's Mcfadden?
But seriously come on now, That guy is a total Homer and thank God that my work restricted me from listening to that non sense.
Chicken Leg Mcfadden is overrated.
correction my friend its Chicken McNuggets
Aug 19, 2009 at 12:37 PM
- Slash49
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,537
Originally posted by Overkill:
Skip ahead to the 14:30 mark unless you want to hear more about the Favre saga.
And yeah - Williamson's only argument for McFadden over Willis was essentially that one plays RB (a "skill position") and one does not. Nevermind pro bowls, etc. RB always trumps LB, apparently.
Sando had a good line about how SF went 7-9 last year and that is the equivalent of a decade's worth of wins for Oakland. I had to laugh at that one.
Tell that to Peterson!!!!
]
Aug 19, 2009 at 7:36 PM
- RedWaltz24
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,120
Sorry for not putting the time in the podcast when the debate begins. I updated the original post to reflect that information.
Aug 19, 2009 at 7:50 PM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
Originally posted by Slash49:Originally posted by Overkill:
Skip ahead to the 14:30 mark unless you want to hear more about the Favre saga.
And yeah - Williamson's only argument for McFadden over Willis was essentially that one plays RB (a "skill position") and one does not. Nevermind pro bowls, etc. RB always trumps LB, apparently.
Sando had a good line about how SF went 7-9 last year and that is the equivalent of a decade's worth of wins for Oakland. I had to laugh at that one.
Tell that to Peterson!!!!
]
Aug 19, 2009 at 8:28 PM
- OHHWHAT
- Info N/A
mcfadden better than P-Dub?what!!!!!!!!
Aug 19, 2009 at 9:03 PM
- Slash49
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,537
Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by Slash49:Originally posted by Overkill:
Skip ahead to the 14:30 mark unless you want to hear more about the Favre saga.
And yeah - Williamson's only argument for McFadden over Willis was essentially that one plays RB (a "skill position") and one does not. Nevermind pro bowls, etc. RB always trumps LB, apparently.
Sando had a good line about how SF went 7-9 last year and that is the equivalent of a decade's worth of wins for Oakland. I had to laugh at that one.
Tell that to Peterson!!!!
]
Aug 19, 2009 at 9:05 PM
- rob28
- Veteran
- Posts: 561
"the glory of the yester years does not satisfy the 49erfaithfull anymore."
Aug 19, 2009 at 9:14 PM
- ObePwnD
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,465
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
rock bottom sucks.
I disagree. We're not rock bottom, we're just hanging from a rocky ledge that's so close to the bottom that we won't break our legs when we let go.
- 1 2