Originally posted by BigMar:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by BigMar:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by BigMar:Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by BigMar:
The team and some fan's want you to believe that "pressure" is more important than "sacks".
Because for the last decade+ the 9ers have been sickly in getting "sacks" and "intereceptions"..... but simply because the team got some pre-season intereceptions those Fan's and the team want you to overlook the fact that they STILL CAN"T SACK THE Q.B.!
yup cause you know more than the entire team and the entire coaching staff. IF you are so great at the game of football and you know so much, what team are you coaching again? Ahhh yea I thought so
Interesting....you have "thoughts"?
yes but when I have a "thought" I don't create a thread just because it is a "thought"
Well here, use your "thoughts" on this....
Fred Dean = Sack Master = 9ers Super Bowl
Charles Haley = Sack Master = 9ers Super Bowl
Charles Haley = Sack Master = Dallas Super Bowl
so your saying that Fred Dean and Charles Haley won those Superbowls all by themselves
No, you are saying that.
Clearly, what I am implying is that Dean & Haley were KEY elements to winning playoff and superbowl games as they could "consistanly" change the course of the games by producing >>>>SACKS.
Getting the picture?
By your ideology the team that has the SACK leader for that particular year should win the SB seems how he is the SACK MASTER for that year. Lets see if that is how it plays out.
Season---sack leader and team they were on--------team that one the SB
Should I continue?