Originally posted by KRS-1:
Originally posted by oldman9er:
I guess it is not that big of a difference... 4-3 and 1-gap 3-4.
Not not really but I think we could have and should have moved to a 4-3 Defense this offseason. We would have also had an easier time finding players who could fit that defense in both the draft and FA, and I believe we could have had a stronger defensive unit.
I think we would be in the minority on that, but yes. I'm a fan of the 3-4, but I would never want to run one without an impact NT. I know we would then have uncertainties of our rush DL, but I think we have some decent possibilities in-house. As you said, we could always have leaned on this draft for another DE rusher.
It is what it is though. Not gonna gripe about it now.