Originally posted by communist:
The Gase-story is two years old and nobody reported it like that.
Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
There are 256 users in the forums
Trent Baalke and chip discussion thread.
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:22 PM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,190
Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by father49er:Originally posted by communist:The Gase-story is two years old and nobody reported it like that.
Exactly. Revisionist history. He's now throwing Trent under the bus for his bad decisions. It was also reported that he wanted Harbaugh out, not Trent.
We do need to be leery. There is certainly a theme of leaks and reports right before and after firings.
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:29 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,141
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Ever thought that the "source" could be one of Jed's yes men?
Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 120,278
Glazer is always on point.
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:32 PM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,190
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Ever thought that the "source" could be one of Jed's yes men?
Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Ever thought that Glazer is typically right on with his accurate reports? I just dont believe he would risk his reputation and put this out if it wasnt on target.
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:33 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 120,278
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by communist:Ever thought that the "source" could be one of Jed's yes men?Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Ever thought that Glazer is typically right on with his accurate reports? I just dont believe he would risk his reputation and put this out if it wasnt on target.
Exactly he's not jason cole or laconfora
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:35 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,141
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Glazer is the only one who is reporting that. And like stated, the Gase-story is two years old.
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Ever thought that the "source" could be one of Jed's yes men?
Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Ever thought that Glazer is typically right on with his accurate reports? I just dont believe he would risk his reputation and put this out if it wasnt on target.
Since when does a sports journalist care about his reputation?
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:37 PM
- Ninerjohn
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,190
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Glazer is the only one who is reporting that. And like stated, the Gase-story is two years old.
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Ever thought that the "source" could be one of Jed's yes men?
Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Ever thought that Glazer is typically right on with his accurate reports? I just dont believe he would risk his reputation and put this out if it wasnt on target.
Since when does a sports journalist care about his reputation?
Dont believe it then. I couldnt care less to be honest but I think Baalke is a scumbag and I choose to trust Glazer's report.
Jan 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,141
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Either Baalke is a very good actor or he really is a good person. If the former one is true, then I am happy that we got rid of him.
Dont believe it then. I couldnt care less to be honest but I think Baalke is a scumbag and I choose to trust Glazer's report.
And why do you believe that Baalke is a scumbag? Wishful thinking or at least some reports?
Jan 2, 2017 at 5:29 PM
- Leathaface
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,331
I don't know if Jed and Trent are sleeping together or what, but some of what is coming out is absolutely insane.
We could have had Gase? He vetoed Dak Prescott when Chip wanted him? He has been undermining Chip for weeks?
Ultimately, this all falls on the hands of Jed York and unfortunately there's no firing of him.
We could have had Gase? He vetoed Dak Prescott when Chip wanted him? He has been undermining Chip for weeks?
Ultimately, this all falls on the hands of Jed York and unfortunately there's no firing of him.
Jan 2, 2017 at 5:31 PM
- jcashen87
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,743
Originally posted by communist:Either Baalke is a very good actor or he really is a good person. If the former one is true, then I am happy that we got rid of him.Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Dont believe it then. I couldnt care less to be honest but I think Baalke is a scumbag and I choose to trust Glazer's report.
And why do you believe that Baalke is a scumbag? Wishful thinking or at least some reports?
I think Glazer handles enough NFL reports that he would be able to tell if the info came to him via. Jed York channel. Thus making the info possibly lame or biased etc. glazer has usually been right on, said at the beginning of 14' that Harbs was out regardless. Etc etc, he's up there with Schefer IMO
Jan 2, 2017 at 5:34 PM
- itlynstalyn
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,520
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by communist:Glazer is the only one who is reporting that. And like stated, the Gase-story is two years old.Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by communist:Ever thought that the "source" could be one of Jed's yes men?Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Are you calling Glazer a liar? Why would he make that transcript and ruin his reputation on a false report?
Ever thought that Glazer is typically right on with his accurate reports? I just dont believe he would risk his reputation and put this out if it wasnt on target.
Since when does a sports journalist care about his reputation?
Dont believe it then. I couldnt care less to be honest but I think Baalke is a scumbag and I choose to trust Glazer's report.
Lol this. The desperation to try and defend Baalke is getting really pathetic.
Jan 2, 2017 at 5:45 PM
- KezarLivin
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,902
Originally posted by Leathaface:
I don't know if Jed and Trent are sleeping together or what, but some of what is coming out is absolutely insane.
We could have had Gase? He vetoed Dak Prescott when Chip wanted him? He has been undermining Chip for weeks?
Ultimately, this all falls on the hands of Jed York and unfortunately there's no firing of him.
Sadly none of this surprises me. Always struck me as one of those drunk with power, blind to his own incompetence types.
Jan 2, 2017 at 5:47 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,141
Originally posted by jcashen87:due to contract situation and Harbaugh's disrespect towards Jed anyone knew that he won't survive any longer save for some unreal success like the SB win.
I think Glazer handles enough NFL reports that he would be able to tell if the info came to him via. Jed York channel. Thus making the info possibly lame or biased etc. glazer has usually been right on, said at the beginning of 14' that Harbs was out regardless. Etc etc, he's up there with Schefer IMO
Jan 2, 2017 at 5:49 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,141
Originally posted by KezarLivin:Lol, now he is incompetent because he vetoed a QB in round 4? If Dak were the real deal, he would be gone way earlier than that. Perhaps we should avoid any personnel guy from the Patriots because they missed out on Prescott as well.
Sadly none of this surprises me. Always struck me as one of those drunk with power, blind to his own incompetence types.