Ryan Mallett traded to Texans

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by WeDidIt:

LOL. The Fitzpatrick experiment lasted how long?

Will be interesting to see Mallett in a different offense. I think he's pretty good, but imobile so I hope Houston's line is up to the task.

This is the very reason I didn't want him in San Francisco. Many were vouching for us to trade for him when Gabbert began to stink it up in the preseason, but it makes no sense to get a guy that is immobile in today's NFL unless you have a dominant pass protecting O-Line.

Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Belichick waited to long to trade Mallett, if he pulled the trigger last season he would've received much more than a 7th rounder. His next move will be out of the league.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by RishikeshA:

Belichick waited to long to trade Mallett, if he pulled the trigger last season he would've received much more than a 7th rounder. His next move will be out of the league.

Assuming that anyone was offering anything higher at that time. Mallett has always been a guy that was big on potential, short on results. If O'Brien thinks he can develop him, more power to him but if he was really that into Mallett, he could have gotten him quite a bit earlier in the offseason for probably just a slightly higher asking price.

Originally posted by H41L5ATAN:

Ryan Mallet will win a playoff game before RG3, Andy Dalton, and Nick Foles.

Book it.

Originally posted by RishikeshA:

The whole point of the matter is that Belichick gave Mallett away. Belichick doesn't give ice in the winter, if he were worth something Belichick would've received max.

Originally posted by titan:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by WeDidIt:
LOL. The Fitzpatrick experiment lasted how long?

Will be interesting to see Mallett in a different offense. I think he's pretty good, but imobile so I hope Houston's line is up to the task.

This is the very reason I didn't want him in San Francisco. Many were vouching for us to trade for him when Gabbert began to stink it up in the preseason, but it makes no sense to get a guy that is immobile in today's NFL unless you have a dominant pass protecting O-Line.

I'd take the top 1 and 2 most immobile QB in the NFL as my starter anyday.

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by titan:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by WeDidIt:

LOL. The Fitzpatrick experiment lasted how long?

Will be interesting to see Mallett in a different offense. I think he's pretty good, but imobile so I hope Houston's line is up to the task.

This is the very reason I didn't want him in San Francisco. Many were vouching for us to trade for him when Gabbert began to stink it up in the preseason, but it makes no sense to get a guy that is immobile in today's NFL unless you have a dominant pass protecting O-Line.

I'd take the top 1 and 2 most immobile QB in the NFL as my starter anyday.

I'd take Aaron Rodgers over both of those guys.

Originally posted by titan:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by titan:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by WeDidIt:
LOL. The Fitzpatrick experiment lasted how long?

Will be interesting to see Mallett in a different offense. I think he's pretty good, but imobile so I hope Houston's line is up to the task.

This is the very reason I didn't want him in San Francisco. Many were vouching for us to trade for him when Gabbert began to stink it up in the preseason, but it makes no sense to get a guy that is immobile in today's NFL unless you have a dominant pass protecting O-Line.

I'd take the top 1 and 2 most immobile QB in the NFL as my starter anyday.

I'd take Aaron Rodgers over both of those guys.

Because of age maybe.