Originally posted by TexasNiner:
This move combined with the Haralson move and the associated WR signing completely baffle me. We already have multiple late round draft picks, so more than enough ammo to move around. And actually drafting players in the 7th round has for the most part yielded players who don't make the team or who are cut within a year or two.
So, we give up on two talented, valuable players at a position where depth should be a priority, for picks that will have very limited value for us, and we cut at least 3 WRs that showed promise in our system and have real NFL experience for an unknown commodity who couldn't make an NFL roster?
Just makes no sense to me. Those 7th round picks (especially now that we have done it twice) will never be as valuable to us as either player would be if have an injury at OLB. Much like the injuries that were a big part of the reason our D went downhill at the end of last year and were major factor in losing the Super Bowl.
I really think this front office, in spite of all their success, sometimes gets too cute for their own good and ends up outsmarting themselves.
So, while as a fan, I hope I'm wrong, and these moves don't hurt us, I will be shocked if they don't down the line and if we get more benefit from Harper and two 7th round picks than we would have gotten from Haralson, Johnson or one of the WRs we cut.
Bill Walsh said that multiple late picks are often more likely to get you a player than a single early pick. The 49ers have several late picks and UDFA pick ups that prove you can get talent late.
There is no way the 49ers could keep 6 OLBs on the roster ... nor does anybody keep 200% backups at LB. Draft picks are VERY valuable because teams that value them stay better for longer.
I may be wrong and I don't have a history of being good at evaluating WRs but I think Harper is more likely to produce for the 49ers than any of the WRs let go to get to the 53 man limit.