Originally posted by ModestoNiner33:
They came to play tonight, might as well give respect when it's due.
I'll pay my respects when we bury them.
There are 221 users in the forums
Originally posted by ModestoNiner33:
They came to play tonight, might as well give respect when it's due.
Originally posted by SofaKing:Originally posted by ModestoNiner33:They came to play tonight, might as well give respect when it's due.
I'll pay my respects when we bury them.
Originally posted by RishikeshA:Seahawks just scored on a 109 yard fumble recovery and run, lead 24-7. Game much closer than the score. The Broncos are running through the Seahawks front 7. The 49ers are definitely watching. The Hawks tackle the ball and cause turnovers. Wilson's scrambling makes up for a mediocre OL. The Hawks and Rams play in a chippie fashion trying to antagonize the opposition. The Niners can out muscle this team but they have to play a clean game. The Hawks are a Super Bowl team at home and a Wild Card on the road. Our special teams will have to step up or else we'll be giving up too many cheap points.
Originally posted by ninerjok:
I would need to see the replay of this so-called 109 yd fumble recovery/return for TD you mention. Wouldn't they have to recover a fumble in the end zone they're defending to make it 109 yds? In which case a bronco player would have had to fumble the ball in the end zone he's trying to score in which means he would've possessed the ball already in the end zone making it a touchdown for Denver isn't that correct? That makes no sense to me unless the Denver player didn't maintain clear possession of the ball while in the end zone and going to the ground in the end zone thus making it a live ball. Is that what happened?
Originally posted by SofaKing:Originally posted by ninerjok:I would need to see the replay of this so-called 109 yd fumble recovery/return for TD you mention. Wouldn't they have to recover a fumble in the end zone they're defending to make it 109 yds? In which case a bronco player would have had to fumble the ball in the end zone he's trying to score in which means he would've possessed the ball already in the end zone making it a touchdown for Denver isn't that correct? That makes no sense to me unless the Denver player didn't maintain clear possession of the ball while in the end zone and going to the ground in the end zone thus making it a live ball. Is that what happened?
Denver RB lost the ball right before crossing the plane. Seattle LB put a helmet on it, ball flew forward into the endzone.
Originally posted by Rascal:
Holy crap !! Is this for real ? 40-7 and we still have one quarter to play ? We couldn't even get one single TD. Is this the sign of things to come ?
Originally posted by ninerjok:
Okay I understand now. But if the Denver player had tackled that Seattle defender in the end zone it would've been a safety for Denver. But I see the ball flew forward to the back of the end zone, making it the longest touchdown distance possible on the fumble return. It's a good play by the Seattle defender to cause the fumble before the bronco player crosses the goal line but you sure have to have some kind of damn lucky bounce to recover that fumble clear in the back of the end zone and make that kind of play resulting in a touchdown.
Originally posted by 5280High:
Calm down, Denver actually dominated the first half just turned the ball over. They ran the ball down Seattle's dick holster (throat) pretty easily.
Originally posted by Rascal:
They are not showing the game here. If the Broncos dominated the 1st half and ran the ball down their throats, how the hell did we end up with 40-7 ?