14 of our 22 starters are from the draft!
NFL Starting 22 Grid
There are 94 users in the forums
NFL Team by Team Grid of how their Starting 22 was Assembled
Share this on Facebook
Share this on Twitter
Share this on Google+
Share this on LinkedIn
Share this on Pinterest
Share this on StumbleUpon
Share this on Reddit
Share via SMS
Share via Email
- Page 1 of 1
- 1
- goto
Go To Page:
Jul 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM
#1
- Fanatic24
- Veteran
- Posts: 23
Jul 13, 2013 at 5:45 PM
#2
- defenderDX
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,922
Jul 14, 2013 at 11:50 AM
#3
- buck
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,137
The league average is 13.12 starters by the draft.
Teams with number of starters drafted.
PIT 19
ATL 18
CAR 17
MIN 17
CLE 16
GB 16
KC 16
BAL 15
TEN 15
ARZ 14
BUF 14
CINI 14
SF 14
TB 14
DAL 13
HOU 13
JAX 13
NE 13
STL 13
DET 12
MIA 12
NYJ 12
SD 12
SEA 12
CHI 11
DEN 11
NO 11
NYG 11
OAK 11
PHI 10
WSH 9
IND 8
HOU 7
Teams with number of starters drafted.
PIT 19
ATL 18
CAR 17
MIN 17
CLE 16
GB 16
KC 16
BAL 15
TEN 15
ARZ 14
BUF 14
CINI 14
SF 14
TB 14
DAL 13
HOU 13
JAX 13
NE 13
STL 13
DET 12
MIA 12
NYJ 12
SD 12
SEA 12
CHI 11
DEN 11
NO 11
NYG 11
OAK 11
PHI 10
WSH 9
IND 8
HOU 7
Jul 14, 2013 at 12:27 PM
#4
- buck
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,137
Draft 14
Unrestricted Free Agents 4
trade 1
waivers 1
UDFA 2
Boone and Dawson were UDFA.
edit: The starting 22 does not include Dawson who is a kicker.
If you check the site's depth charts, they have Ian Williams, an undrafted free agent listed as the starting nose tackle.
I think that Dorsey, not Williams, will be the starter. Dorsey was an unrestricted free agent.
http://www.profootballrosters.com/2012-san-francisco-49ers-3-deep-depth-chart/
,
Unrestricted Free Agents 4
trade 1
waivers 1
UDFA 2
Boone and Dawson were UDFA.
edit: The starting 22 does not include Dawson who is a kicker.
If you check the site's depth charts, they have Ian Williams, an undrafted free agent listed as the starting nose tackle.
I think that Dorsey, not Williams, will be the starter. Dorsey was an unrestricted free agent.
http://www.profootballrosters.com/2012-san-francisco-49ers-3-deep-depth-chart/
,
[ Edited by buck on Jul 14, 2013 at 11:22 PM ]
Jul 14, 2013 at 8:14 PM
#5
- Empire49
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,818
Originally posted by Fanatic24:
14 of our 22 starters are from the draft!
NFL Starting 22 Grid
Not sure what this really means though. If you look at the teams with the most drafted starters, some of them aren't good. Check out the teams with as many as or more drafted starters than us: PIT 19, ATL 18, CAR 17, MIN 17, CLE 16, GB 16, KC 16, BAL 15, TEN 15, ARZ 14, BUF 14, CINI 14, TB 14. The only true Super Bowl contenders there are Atlanta and Green Bay. A few of those teams are straight up garbage. Meanwhile, teams like Houston, Seattle and Denver - all considered legitimate contenders - rank near the bottom.
I'm all for building through the draft, but this list doesn't prove anything IMO.
Jul 14, 2013 at 11:28 PM
#6
- buck
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,137
Originally posted by Empire49:
Originally posted by Fanatic24:
14 of our 22 starters are from the draft!
NFL Starting 22 Grid
Not sure what this really means though. If you look at the teams with the most drafted starters, some of them aren't good. Check out the teams with as many as or more drafted starters than us: PIT 19, ATL 18, CAR 17, MIN 17, CLE 16, GB 16, KC 16, BAL 15, TEN 15, ARZ 14, BUF 14, CINI 14, TB 14. The only true Super Bowl contenders there are Atlanta and Green Bay. A few of those teams are straight up garbage. Meanwhile, teams like Houston, Seattle and Denver - all considered legitimate contenders - rank near the bottom.
I'm all for building through the draft, but this list doesn't prove anything IMO.
Interesting point, but who said that this list proved anything?

Jul 16, 2013 at 12:07 AM
#7
- Empire49
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,818
Originally posted by buck:Originally posted by Empire49:Originally posted by Fanatic24:14 of our 22 starters are from the draft!
NFL Starting 22 Grid
Not sure what this really means though. If you look at the teams with the most drafted starters, some of them aren't good. Check out the teams with as many as or more drafted starters than us: PIT 19, ATL 18, CAR 17, MIN 17, CLE 16, GB 16, KC 16, BAL 15, TEN 15, ARZ 14, BUF 14, CINI 14, TB 14. The only true Super Bowl contenders there are Atlanta and Green Bay. A few of those teams are straight up garbage. Meanwhile, teams like Houston, Seattle and Denver - all considered legitimate contenders - rank near the bottom.
I'm all for building through the draft, but this list doesn't prove anything IMO.
Interesting point, but who said that this list proved anything?
Well, nobody said it, but what's the point of compiling a list if it isn't supposed to prove anything at all?
Jul 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM
#8
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 31,901
Originally posted by Empire49:Originally posted by buck:Originally posted by Empire49:Originally posted by Fanatic24:14 of our 22 starters are from the draft!
NFL Starting 22 Grid
Not sure what this really means though. If you look at the teams with the most drafted starters, some of them aren't good. Check out the teams with as many as or more drafted starters than us: PIT 19, ATL 18, CAR 17, MIN 17, CLE 16, GB 16, KC 16, BAL 15, TEN 15, ARZ 14, BUF 14, CINI 14, TB 14. The only true Super Bowl contenders there are Atlanta and Green Bay. A few of those teams are straight up garbage. Meanwhile, teams like Houston, Seattle and Denver - all considered legitimate contenders - rank near the bottom.
I'm all for building through the draft, but this list doesn't prove anything IMO.
Interesting point, but who said that this list proved anything?
Well, nobody said it, but what's the point of compiling a list if it isn't supposed to prove anything at all?
Welcome to the Zone, home of things which don't prove much. Particularly during the offseason
- Page 1 of 1
- 1
- goto
Go To Page: