Originally posted by hawker84:
really? how's saying Kap is not better than RW, how is that saying RW is better.. ? think you're reading what you want to read into that...
OK OK, so you're saying they're even then, the way you worded it cracked me up though. "Im not saying Coke is better than Pepsi, Im just saying Pepsi isn't better than Coke"!
Listen, you're on a 9ers forum asking about its biggest rival, what the hell did you think people would reply with??? I think the better question to ask is if you were starting a NFL team, based on what we saw in 2012 and based on how you would project the future of these players, how would your rank the following 1st year starters....
Taking everything into consideration, I would go....
I think Luck is the best of the bunch and has it ALL. Kaep has the most upside due to his unique physical set and mentality. RGIII has an amazing skill set, physically and mentally, probably a hair better than Kaeps, but his size to endure over the long haul is a serious question. Wilson lacks the total package of Luck and unique physical skill sets of RGIII and Kaep, but is built well, has high end football IQ and ice water in his veins. Kaep and Wilson benefited from a MUCH better supporting cast than both Indy and Wash. They both took their teams to the playoffs while our boys inherited playoff teams. If you swapped Luck for Wilson and Kaep for RGIII, I have my doubts that Indy and Washington would have made the postseason in 2012. I think Luck and RGIII are special talents, and would rank them 1 & 2, but RGIII is built like a WR so I would give Kaep the ever so slight nudge ahead of him.