There are 213 users in the forums
BRING BACK THE LOS ANGELES RAMS?
BRING BACK THE LOS ANGELES RAMS?
Jul 11, 2013 at 4:16 PM
- pdizo916
- Member
- Posts: 38,241
they should move to sacramento.
Jul 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM
- 80849er4life
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,846
As long as the team doesnt beat the Niners, I dont care where they are.....
Jul 11, 2013 at 9:04 PM
- GolittaCamper
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,277
Originally posted by RishikeshA:
Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
Georgia Frontier was a hoebag.
Married 7 times.
She's dead
Jul 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM
- BobS
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,638
I don't care, just because I moved to the East Coast. Used to go to the 49er games at Anaheim Stadium, toward the end other when they played the 49ers (because it was full of 49er fans) the stadium was only 1/3 of the way full.
Jul 13, 2013 at 1:45 AM
- LivingInExile
- Veteran
- Posts: 122
Los Angeles doesn't want them, neither does Orange County. Send 'em back to Cleveland where they originated. The Browns suck, maybe they'll gladly take 'em back.
Jul 13, 2013 at 9:30 AM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,185
St. Louis just rejected their plans to get $700 million in funds to improve the Edward Jones Dome. Bring 'em back to LA! Then I could road trip down to LA to see some rivalry games.
Jul 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM
- TheXFactor
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,566
Jax makes much more sense than the Rams
Jul 14, 2013 at 10:01 PM
- Pillbusta
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,868
Yes I don't want them to have the time zone advantage
Jan 31, 2014 at 2:09 AM
- Dr_Bill_Walsh
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,125
there
Feb 1, 2014 at 3:39 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,136
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:What would it have meant if they had approved it? That the City, and not the Rams' owner, would have paid 700 mio. for a stadium improvement?
St. Louis just rejected their plans to get $700 million in funds to improve the Edward Jones Dome. Bring 'em back to LA! Then I could road trip down to LA to see some rivalry games.
[ Edited by communist on Feb 1, 2014 at 3:39 PM ]
Feb 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,136
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:No, it doesn't. Neither for LA nor for the division.
Jax makes much more sense than the Rams
It seems like in LA live a lot of fairweather fans. This type of "fans" needs a successful franchise; the Rams are certainly closer to this status than the Jags.
The division rivals will be happy if the Rams move to the westcoast due to shorter journey.
As for the jags, they have to play against Indy, Tennessee and Houston.
Besides Seattle, Niners and Cardinals from the NFC (=they will face them every 4 years), the only teams on the westcoast they will AFC regularly (=AFC), are the Chargers and the Raiders, if at all (either they are scheduled to play against the AFC West or they finished the season at the same place in their division like the the Raiders or the Chargers in the AFC west).
Otherwise, they have to travel a lot.
It would make much more sense, if the Rams move to LA and the Jags move to St. Louis. The Colts and the Titans are very close (approx. 400km each), Houston is closer to St. Louis than to Jacksonville.
Feb 1, 2014 at 4:13 PM
- jrg
- Veteran
- Posts: 166,549
NO!!
Feb 1, 2014 at 5:57 PM
- ElephantHaley
- Member
- Posts: 7,020
That would be nice if the Lambs moved back to LA. I personally think its gonna happen. Why else would he buy 60 acres. Makes all the sense in the world. I'd rather the 49ers play the Lambs pacific time on grass then central or eastern time in a dome. Plus it would spice up the rivalry that died in 1990.
Feb 1, 2014 at 6:08 PM
- Jakemall
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,598
Originally posted by jrg:
NO!!
This. Please not the rams.... Let JRG keep them.
Feb 1, 2014 at 6:54 PM
- itlynstalyn
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,520
It'll happen. LA needs a team and the Rams are the only team in the West that isn't really in the West.